My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1979-05-23 Special Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1970's
>
1979
>
1979-05-23 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:54 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:35:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• Special Meeting 5/23/79 6 <br />Joe Ligi asked if any one revenue was growing faster? The <br />Administrator stated that the sales tax and ad valorem tax <br />because of our growth. <br />The question was asked what the City would have to do to go <br />on surface water. The City will contract with Houston on a <br />take or pay basis. <br />Industry has been told to close their wells and convert to sur .- <br />face water. <br />The question was asked if we anticipate substantial tax increase <br />in the future. The City does not. <br />The Administrator stated that the City had done a complete <br />re-evaluation of all property this past year. A $15,000.00 <br />tax exemption was given to the over-65 or fixed income citizen. <br />The tax rate dropped and the City dropped the sales tax on <br />utility bills. The re-evaluation was to equalize not increase <br />revenue. Sufficient information was given to the public to <br />inform them of this equity and it was well received quite well. <br />• It was determined that the large increase in the budget for the <br />past two years was due to increase in personnel and capital <br />equipment; upgrading of equipment will continue for the next few <br />years. <br />It was determined that due to the officials conservative <br />fiscal responsibility that both the new city hall and police <br />building were paid for out of accumulated surplus and did not <br />use the Revenue Sharing funds for operating. <br />The City does not use grant funds for operational money. We have <br />one police officer and his employment is contingent on grant funds. <br />The question was asked if there was a surplus of funds? The <br />Administrator stated that he felt there was no surplus. At the <br />end of the budget year we had $785,000.00. It costs $350,000 <br />per month to operate. <br />It was determined that the City had 128 full time employees. <br />We have reduced from 179 to 128. The most part of the reduction <br />was when we ended the CETA employment. The City determined that <br />was more of a liability than an asset. <br />The question was asked if on the Chart of Accounts, it included <br />annexing part of industry. Yes, it does, 50$/508. <br />• The City's fiscal year is October 1 through September 30. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.