Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• Special Meeting 5/23/79 6 <br />Joe Ligi asked if any one revenue was growing faster? The <br />Administrator stated that the sales tax and ad valorem tax <br />because of our growth. <br />The question was asked what the City would have to do to go <br />on surface water. The City will contract with Houston on a <br />take or pay basis. <br />Industry has been told to close their wells and convert to sur .- <br />face water. <br />The question was asked if we anticipate substantial tax increase <br />in the future. The City does not. <br />The Administrator stated that the City had done a complete <br />re-evaluation of all property this past year. A $15,000.00 <br />tax exemption was given to the over-65 or fixed income citizen. <br />The tax rate dropped and the City dropped the sales tax on <br />utility bills. The re-evaluation was to equalize not increase <br />revenue. Sufficient information was given to the public to <br />inform them of this equity and it was well received quite well. <br />• It was determined that the large increase in the budget for the <br />past two years was due to increase in personnel and capital <br />equipment; upgrading of equipment will continue for the next few <br />years. <br />It was determined that due to the officials conservative <br />fiscal responsibility that both the new city hall and police <br />building were paid for out of accumulated surplus and did not <br />use the Revenue Sharing funds for operating. <br />The City does not use grant funds for operational money. We have <br />one police officer and his employment is contingent on grant funds. <br />The question was asked if there was a surplus of funds? The <br />Administrator stated that he felt there was no surplus. At the <br />end of the budget year we had $785,000.00. It costs $350,000 <br />per month to operate. <br />It was determined that the City had 128 full time employees. <br />We have reduced from 179 to 128. The most part of the reduction <br />was when we ended the CETA employment. The City determined that <br />was more of a liability than an asset. <br />The question was asked if on the Chart of Accounts, it included <br />annexing part of industry. Yes, it does, 50$/508. <br />• The City's fiscal year is October 1 through September 30. <br />