My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1981-07-15 Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1981
>
1981-07-15 Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:36:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/15/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> <br />• Minutes, Joint Public Hearing and Regular Meeting, <br />July 15, 1981, Page 5 <br />out there can't stand any more. If they come in there and <br />build us some adequate drainage and put storm sewer out <br />there to handle the run-off, that will change things. As <br />of right now, it is not feasible to put one more house out <br />there, much less what we are talking about here now. <br />Walter Valentine - 10915 San Jacinto Drive (Lomax): On top <br />of the fact that we don't have adequate drainage in Lomax, <br />the crime rate is going up. Tuesday night of last week <br />somebody slashed the tires on my daughter's car and also my <br />car. Before there is so many houses goes up, we need the <br />sanitary sewer in the whole area and police protection, and <br />also the drainage. I have lived out there 7 years, and in <br />the last two years when it rains there is no place for the <br />water to go. The ditches next to Santa Anna and Louisiana <br />Chemical haven't been cleansed, so the water just backs up. <br />Faris: Is there somebody planning a housing addition in <br />Lomax that I'm not aware of? <br />Stan Ballard - 11000 San Jacinto (Lomax): We have a flooding <br />• problem out there and it's getting worse. Santa Anna, which <br />runs along the east side of the subdivision out there, acts <br />as a dam. It's got to get up high enough to go over Santa <br />Anna before we get any relief. The sewage problem, when we <br />get a one-inch rain we can't flush our commode. We've only <br />been there two years, so we're a fairly new house. You start <br />adding more houses in there and it can't do anything but get <br />worse. I am in total agreement with the letter that was read, <br />and am totally against 850 square foot houses. <br />C. E. Furlow - 11030 North "H" Street: I object to lowering <br />the standards. <br />Howard Potts - 1210 Travis: I object to it. That is one of <br />the reasons why I moved to Lomax, because of the quality of <br />housing out there. I like the larger houses. When you start <br />building smaller houses there are going to be more of them. <br />You can build 850 square foot house for $34,000; you build <br />one 1250 square feet and you are going to spend $50,000. So <br />it stands to reason you are going to get more 850 than 1200. <br />So I am totally against it. <br />Westergren: Mrs. Muston, would you clarify something for me? <br />Are we talking about changing them to 1200 square foot houses <br />or 1050 square foot houses? If we go back to the standard <br />• residential in La Porte, isn't it 1050 square feet? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.