My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1982-01-06 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1982
>
1982-01-06 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/6/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council <br />January 6, 1982, Page 13 <br />Askins: That suit was a constitutional attack on the creation <br />of the district by a good number of cities, Katy and several <br />cities in southeast Harris County. To my knowledge, it is <br />now being appealed to the upper courts. <br />Meza: As far as Pasadena having a new water contract with <br />Houston, no, I was not aware of Pasadena having a new contract. <br />Of course, I'm not involved with the City of Pasadena in the <br />negotiations of their contracts. Now a feasibility sutdy or <br />an in-depth study has not been done. A preliminary feasibility <br />study was made back before I was mayor. At that particular <br />time, that study told those folks on that Council there was a <br />need. Those folks were desirous of doing something to prepare <br />La Porte for whatever may happen, if we did have to go off <br />ground water. Since then we have been in different meetings <br />with the City of Houston, C.I.W.A. folks and with the subsi- <br />dence district on it. The City of Houston, in fact, at one <br />particular time, Mr. Corbin was there, agreed to sell the area <br />down here water, in fact in a peculiar situation where there <br />was not another treatment facility, and at that time the cost <br />• of water was estimated to have been 18 cents. I understand <br />that today it is somewhere around 22 cents per thousand gallons. <br />The potential customers, well before the sale of anything we <br />are going to have to create potential customers. We had a <br />meeting back in 1979, if I remember correctly, at the Civic <br />Center. I don't have all of the detailed work here in front <br />of me. There were representatives from 13 different industries <br />and representatives from several cities outside our immediate <br />jurisdiction that were interested in paying a share of the cost <br />for an in-depth feasibility study. However, the only way all <br />of these could be brought together is through a water authority <br />that would have the authority to do something, instead of the <br />City of La Porte doing it with everybody else participating. <br />As far as lines going to Fairmont Park, there are adequate lines <br />going to Fairmont Park and there are already emergency connec- <br />tions to Morgan's Point and BayMUD. The line going to Fairmont <br />Park is a 16 inch line. The loop going around McCabe Road is <br />a 12 inch line. If anybody else is desirous of purchasing <br />water, I believe it has been the policy of any city that dis- <br />tributes water, that the purchaser bear the cost of the line <br />laid to that City. The City of La Porte presently pumps 3 mil- <br />lion gallons of water per day. The La Porte Area Water Authority <br />will not operate the La Porte Water Department. The City of <br />La Porte will purchase water from the Authority. The City of <br />Houston indicated to the City of La Porte that a proper water <br />• authority would be allowed to distribute water to other entities <br />in the surrounding area. That is potable water. As far as <br />40 year contracts, I'd have to ask legal counsel about that as <br />far as the limits of a contractural agreement are concerned. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.