My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1982-07-07 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1982
>
1982-07-07 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/7/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• Minutes, Regular Meeting and Public Hearing <br />La Porte City Council, July 7, 1982, Page 5 <br />• <br />issued will be in the event that you want to issue additional <br />bonds under the trust endenture which you can do for the pur- <br />pose of completing the project or expanding, or even refunding <br />the bonds if there is a change in interest rates. <br />Or the corporation may be asked to join in amendments to the <br />loan agreement by releasing some property that is being held <br />as security, but I think it's safe to say that the corpora- <br />tion's actual involvement up to the time of the bond issue <br />is probably limited to review by its legal counsel to make <br />sure that everything's on track and then the actual signing <br />of the documents and passage of the resolutions necessary to <br />the issuance of the bonds. <br />Gay: What if the recipient of these bonds should go into <br />default? <br />Lyons: The important thing to remember is that these bonds <br />are not obligations of the City. Statuatorily they can't be <br />obligations of the City. The incorporation papers of the IDC <br />• clearly state that they are not obligations of the City. Our <br />bond documents clearly states that they are not obligations of <br />the unit which creates the IDC. There are limited obliga- <br />tions of the IDC itself only to the extent of those revenues. <br />The legal documentation under which the bonds will be issued <br />will make it clear that is is not the City's debt. <br />Malone: Will the eligible blighted area in any way interfere <br />with our zoning? <br />Lyons: No, that is only a term of art used in the context <br />of the corporation and the rules that relate to it. It has <br />no legal meaning outside of that. The City Council will give <br />next to the final decision. The way it works is, the City <br />Council says this is the eligible blighted area and they file <br />their resolution declaring with the Texas Industrial Commission <br />and the Commission has 30 days to comment on it. If they make <br />no comment on it, then the EBA goes into effect. To my knowledge, <br />there have been a pretty good number of EBA established, and I <br />don't think the Commission has commented on any of them at all. <br />Matuszak: Is there any way any industry could take advantage <br />of this without the approval of the governing body? <br />Lyons: No, the statute requires that City Council approve any <br />bond resolution of the IDC. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.