Laserfiche WebLink
i Date Subject: ~ - Q~ ator's pe e <br />I 8/18/82 HLbcP RATE INCREASE "`th~ials 3 e 6 <br />of --- <br />i` <br />3) Limit HL~CP's total participation in the $5.5 billion project to $1,692,460,000 with cost overruns ~ <br />being borne by the investor and not the ratepayer. (This amount excludes AFUDC and sales and <br />property taxes.) <br />4) Disallow the cost of the lawsuit filed by HLbcP against Brown & Root. <br />5) Credit any recovery in the lawsuit filed by HL&P against Brown ac Root to the cost of the <br />Project. <br />6) Disallow recovery from the ratepayer of any damages found to be payable by HLbcP in the <br />lawsuit filed by HLEcP against Brown be Root. <br />Other Major Adjustments <br />Excluding Allen's Creek, HLdcP requests a rate base of $4,006,153,000. The Public Service <br />Department recommends an original cost rate base of $3,953,996,000. Other primary differences <br />between the two rate bases include: (1) elimination of $6,319,000 for certain cost-free capital; (2) <br />elimination of $5,993,000 in deferred taxes; and (3) elimination of $22,954,000-for plant held for future <br />use which includes the site for Allen's Creek. <br />COST OF CAPITAL <br />The average weighted cost of capital proposed by HLbcP is 12.98%. The Public Service <br />Department recommends 12.73% based on the following considerations: (See tiVilton, Schedule I, for <br />• suggested method for determining cost of capital). <br />Average Cost of Debt <br />HLbcP proposes 9.55%. The Public Service Department recommends 9.55%. This percentage is <br />based on the actual average cost of long-term debt for which the Company is presently obligated. <br />Return on Equity <br />HLBcP has requested a 17.50% return on equity. The Public Service Department recommends <br />16.95%. The recommendation is based on an assessment of risk in raising capital for the Company's <br />massive construction program. Although the Company has indicated that by recovering money for the <br />cancellation of Allen's Creek Nuclear Project they would be able to bring the two lignite projects (4 <br />units) on line one year earlier than originally anticipated, we have had to maintain the original <br />schedule for the lignite plants in order to allow the Company enough internal cash to finance the other <br />projects. By eliminating Allen's Creek as a means for recovery of funds, the Company's ability to <br />generate cash internally is reduced. <br />Both Standard be Poor's Corporation and Moody's Investor Service, the two major securities <br />rating agencies, have downgraded HLacP to A+ and A-1, respectively, from a AA status because of the <br />financial risk associated with the Company's construction program. Further downgrading would lead to <br />higher interest cost to the ratepayer and limit the available financial markets. Therefore, it is <br />important to generate sufficient cash internally to enable the Company to finance the majority of its <br />needs through stocks and bonds. Although the PUC has generally prescribed a parameter of 40% for <br />internal cash generation, our recommendation allows the Company to recover approximately 35% <br />.through rates. A 16.95% return on equity is necessary to achieve the 35% parameter. The recent <br />decline in market interest rates should impact favorably upon the Company's ability to finance its <br />capital needs for the next year. <br />n-0a <br />