My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-05-1983 Public Hearing (2)
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
12-05-1983 Public Hearing (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:57 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:38:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/5/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes, Public H• ring, La Porte City Coun~ <br />December 5, 1983, Page 4 <br />thing with Spenwick. College View and Spenwick have been under <br />• the supervision of the master planning jurisdiction and what we <br />call subdivision ordinance jurisdiction of La Porte for their <br />entire histories. <br />On the Justice Department question, all annexations of populated <br />areas have to be approved by the United States Justice Department <br />if they're. in Texas or the other Southern States that are under <br />the Voting Rights Act. And we are preparing a-brief and we have <br />it in draft form, to submit to the Justice Department; the burden <br />of proof is strictly on the City to justify the annexation that it <br />will not impair minority voting rights. Now La Porte adopted a <br />charter a few years ago which the Justice Department approved; <br />one of the conditions being on single member districts. We have <br />six single member districts, one of which is a heavily minority <br />district on the north side of La Porte, which has elected a black <br />City Councilman twice. It's my own opinion that the Justice <br />Department will be'we11 satisfied with what has occurred in <br />La Porte, the commitments La Porte has previously made and kept <br />on minority voting rights. And I do not foresee any difficulty <br />in getting Justice Department approval of this annexation. The <br />Justice Department .will have 60 days.-when they receive our brief-- <br />we can't mail it until the day after-the annexation--in which to <br />study it and to approve it. They routinely will contact the <br />prominent minority leaders in our community, essentially to ask <br />them. the question do-they feel like they've been dealt fairly <br />• with, both historically and on this one. This area, if annexed, <br />will be attached to District 2 in La Porte for voting purposes, <br />but in 1985 and every five years under our charter, the whole <br />-City has to be looked at and redistricted and the six districts <br />have got to have a population equality plus or minus 5 percent, <br />and that's the outer limits. So the way La Porte is growing, <br />particularly the west end of town--Fairmont has about 400 building <br />permits a year--we probably are going to see some major shifts <br />in district lines in 1985. Because we have the one man, one <br />vote rule from the Supreme Court, they're very strict about that <br />rule. <br />On the notice, on that gentleman's question, about the .public <br />hearing, hearings on annexation are set by State law. The notice <br />of hearings for these here tonight and the one that was held in <br />November, were published im the Bayshore Sun which is the desig- <br />nated official newspaper of the City of La Porte for publication <br />of its notices and there's been a lot of publicity in the La Porte <br />paper and the Baytown paper which has circulated in La Porte, <br />about the studies, the hearing process, and that type of thing. <br />-Every effort has been made, through the water district board <br />members and others, to make their part of the studies and to <br />disseminate information about the hearings to the public. <br />The reason for the-two hearings tonight was just strictly one of <br />convenience. The Legislature has amended the state law to require <br />a hearing both at your city hall and in the area to be annexed, <br />and this is the hearing in the area to be annexed. That's all the <br />questions I can recall at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.