My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-07-1983 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
12-07-1983 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:57 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:38:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/7/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes,. Regular~eeting, <br />December 7, 1983, Page 7 <br />La Porte City Cou~l <br />• Askins: There was a compromise reached between the National <br />League of Cities representing the cities, and the cable TV <br />industry on a bill. After this was done, a lot of cities <br />got very unhappy and really felt like- the National League of <br />Cities sold out the cities. A lot of the major cities of the <br />country said the National League of Cities does not speak <br />for us on that bill, because it essentially stripped away <br />local authority and control of the cable TV both on the <br />renewal of franchises, setting of rates and regulation of <br />quality of service. I don't think that bill will pass because <br />it doesn't have the support of a lot of the cities. <br />Skelton: The one Congressman Bryant had did have the TML <br />support from what I've heard. <br />Cline: Yes. Did you sit in on any of that discussion at the <br />tea conference? <br />Skelton: No, I missed that. I was sitting in on something <br />e <br />Cline: Even the NLC couldn't agree among themselves what was <br />g~-and what was bad for the cities. I agree, Councilman <br />Skelton; we need to write our Congressmen so they will be <br />aware of how we feel about it. <br />• Owen: I received a letter from Congressman Andrews recently. <br />fought I had passed it on to Council but apparently <br />I didn't, indicating these bills would not come up for <br />committee hearings until Congress reconvenes. <br />Cline: Jack, I think we're going to have to do something <br />but the traffic on Fairmont Parkway in the crossovers in <br />front of the shopping areas. The area in front of Walgreen's <br />and Kroger's is getting dangerous. As you're coming out <br />there's cars swinging around through the crossover and heading <br />in where they shouldn't be. If they'd just go down a couple of <br />blocks and then make their U-turn and come back and come in <br />on .the right side, but they won't do it. What can we do to <br />get this flow of traffic corrected? <br />Owen: We've studied this. ever since the first opening of <br />Fairmont Parkway. It is a problem, and in fact, we'have a <br />problem of our own created somewhat the same way, coming east <br />on Fairmont Parkway and turning back to the north into the <br />first driveway. At first we thought we could handle it with <br />signs,. but we couldn't come up with any sign that will be <br />legal that we could enforce. that would prevent them from coming <br />across. Of course, you cannot enter on that other side, legally. <br />The solution would be to try to get those people to move their <br />driveways. Some of our staff has agreed to contact the stores <br />• there and see if we can get those driveways moved. That's the <br />only solution really, that I know. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.