My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983-10-26 Workshop Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1983-10-26 Workshop Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:58 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:39:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/26/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.,...- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~=- <br /> <br />-11Jo <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />- -'-- <br /> <br />....-.- <br /> <br />-"---"--, <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />TurnerC911ie0Braden Inc. <br /> <br />July 29, 1983 <br />Mr. Jerry L. Hodge <br />City of La Porte <br /> <br />.,. <br /> <br />Page Three <br /> <br />The probable rate of flow in this pipeline is not high <br />enough to prevent settling of solids in this pipe, even <br />during wasting periods. Most of the time the rate of <br />flow will be zero, which will allow further deposition <br />of solids and will increase the potential for the pipe <br />to clog. <br /> <br />.The reia:a~elY ;'ic;~~1::;li;~~~.-~~~~~p: ,~;;,4;g~~~~r'::~a <br />'thickener',""and the. smalI.d1fferenceffi..water surface <br />elevations'l between~'tnese'l~st;ruct.iires'~''<''woula'~'nott be a' <br />;'~ecOnlli\~ded -iarraii9emen€~?UnlesB'>waste;' 'sludge"pmnps, 'were' <br />;''1:>rovided.',f Our cOnclusion'is that the' arrangement of the <br />structures and the piping system is very likely to con- <br />triQute to the pipe clogging and may be totally responsible <br />for the problem. This problem could have been minimized or <br />eliminated by locating the structures closer together, <br />increasing the difference in water surface elevations, <br />'providing a waste.. sludge. pump... station ;or by a. combination <br />'of these methods.,.~~t.~~..this;.:'tiriie?'~the '~only positive solution <br />would be to' provide'-.~~waste _ sludge ~pumps ~t '" -'." . <br /> <br />.; ..:,,:~. ~ ,t,.-,' ;;.:.._;,.:..~..,.tk::;.~..~~.d;.i.:.,t:"i'f.-...tit'~::,'.:~t>:-;.. . '~'.." .;J <br /> <br />Ou~'recommendations for operational procedures to minimize <br />th~~ problem are as follows. <br /> <br />a. Thoroughly clean the piping system. <br />b. Maintain the water surface elevation in the thickener <br />below the overflow weir, at or slightly above the <br />point of discharge in the center feed pipe. This <br />will require the operators to pump out or siphon the <br />supernatant, or else will require modifications to <br />the overflow trough and piping. <br />c. Maintain the water surface elevation in the digester <br />at the maximum practical elevation (approximately <br />elevation 23.19). <br />d. Minimize the wasting period so' as to maximize the <br />~waste sludge flow rate and velocity. Do not attempt <br />to waste continuously or for extended periods of time. <br />Flush the sludge piping with process water after each <br />wasting period. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />C .:..- <br />- -' <br /> <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.