My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1987-12-07 Workshop Meeting and Called Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1987-12-07 Workshop Meeting and Called Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:00 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/7/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT <br />Page 8 of 9 <br /> <br />Amnesty Period <br /> <br />Procrastination is often a part of human nature, and deadlines are <br />difficult to meet for various reasons. In examining the proposed <br />30 or 60 day "amnesty period" for compliance under the new animal <br />ordinance, City staff found that 60 working days would be a <br />reasonable amount of time for individuals concerned about the care <br />of their animals. The 60 working days would allow sufficient time <br />for both animal owner and City staff to register an animal. <br /> <br />It was found that in many instances 30 or 60 working days <br />generally represents the "norm" for compliance in city type <br />actions. Since the ordinance is fairly new, the sixty-day waiting <br />amnesty per iod would be adequate, and allow both staff and pet <br />owners sufficient time to vaccinate, spay, or neuter animal(s) if <br />desired; schedule personal time to visit City Hall and register <br />animal(s); and, other unusual circumstances. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />Based on the report's findings, the following recommendations are <br />suggested for City Council approval: <br /> <br />o Since City veterinarians have a difference of oplnlon in <br />the usage of their rabies tag for the purpose of animal <br />identification, it is recommended that the City continue <br />issuing its metal license tags. This action will insure <br />that registered animal(s) have been vaccinated, and that <br />direct access to information concerning a pet owner is <br />available when requested by the City's Humane Division. <br /> <br />o It is recommended that the City pursue the concept of <br />"microchip" animal tagging for implementation in future <br />budget years. The "mic roc hip " animal tag is a <br />futuristic tool with a growing market demand. <br /> <br />o The neutering or spaying of animals helps to control the <br />unwanted animal population, and as reflected in the <br />report, v ar iou s c it ies prov ide this incent i ve to the <br />public. It is therefore recommended that the City waive <br />the registration fee for pet owner's who neuter or spay <br />their animal(s). However, an initial fee will be <br />required, and pet owner's must continue to register <br /> <br />their pet(s) annually to verify vaccination of the <br />animal( s) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.