Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Bob Herrera, City Hanager <br /> <br />Ervin J. Gl~iffith7Building Official/ t;:{), .4- n <br />Zoning Administrator ~cJ ~~ <br /> <br />Joel H. Albrecht, Director of Community Development ,- <br /> <br />Six Month Review of City Zoning Ordinance No. 1501 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Through: <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />February 23, 1988 <br /> <br />Attached is a draft copy of the Six Month Review to Ordinance No. <br />1501, which has been recommended for favorable consideration to the <br />City Council by the Planning & Zoning Commission. All proposed <br />amendments have been incorporated into the text. All changes are <br />indicated by means of vertical black bars located in the right margin. <br />An index of all proposed amended changes has been included in this <br />pacl(et. <br /> <br />Also included are three map exhibits. Maps A & B indicate the <br />three zoning reclassifications recommended for approval by the Planning <br />& Zoning Coomission. Zoning boundary lines are drawn on these exhibits <br />as they will appear on the City's Official Zoning Map if the changes <br />are adopted by Counc il. Map A concerns Block 93; Bayfront <br />Subdivision. Map B concerns two tracts located in the 9900 Block of <br />West Fairmont Parkway. <br /> <br />Map C involves interpretive changes being made in the Myrtle Creek, <br />W. Main area. These changes are being made in accordance with Section <br />2-700 of the zoning ordinance. The purpose of these changes is to <br />shift zoning lines so they coincide with property lines, rather than <br />bisecting tracts. As these changes do not require Council action, this <br />exhibit is included for informational purposes only. <br /> <br />The Staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission would like to point <br />out to the City Council that Section 11-507(8) of the proposed Six <br />Hon th Rev iew dra ft for the Zon ing Ord inane e does include a pa ragraph <br />concerning existing p~rmissive legislation on the "3/4 rule". If the <br />City Council kept this paragraph in the draft, it would require <br />three-fourths of the members of the City Council voting favorable to <br />overturn a recommendation for denial by the Planning & Zoning <br />Commission. It would only take a simple majority to deny a favorable <br />recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Commission. <br />