My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1989-08-24 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1989
>
1989-08-24 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:01 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte city Council <br />August 24, 1989, Page 2 <br /> <br />5. The following citizens addressed Council: <br /> <br />The Mayor noted that three citizens had telephoned to request <br />their views on the Myrtle Creek traffic situation. They were <br />Robert Hayes, who called to voice opposition to closing Myrtle <br />creek but was in favor of a traffic light; Jeff Tippit, who <br />called to voice opposition to closing Myrtle Creek; and Gary <br />Hamel, who called to endorse a stop sign or traffic light on <br />Myrtle Creek. <br /> <br />Mrs. Barbara Sitzman, 730 Myrtle Creek, addressed Council <br />asking for Council's help in getting traffic control needed <br />on Myrtle Creek started and completed. The traffic accident <br />that happened last week was at her location, and the car <br />involved ended up five feet from her son's bedroom. She asked <br />that Council consider the petition that has been signed with <br />over 300 signatures, which asks for the closing of Myrtle <br />Creek. <br /> <br />Mr. Mike sitzman, 730 Myrtle Creek, addressed Council to <br />confirm his wife's statements. He felt that stop signs and <br />traffic control signals might slow down traffic, but it would <br />not hinder the amount of traffic on Myrtle Creek. He feels <br />the "pipeline hump" contributes to the problem of safety in <br />crossing the street. He feels closing Myrtle Creek and <br />putting an entrance in somewhere else in order to make it less <br />convenient to drive straight through the subdivision. He <br />thinks this would bea better solution than a stop sign or <br />traffic light on that street. <br /> <br />Kevin DeShazo, 5625 Stone Creek Drive, addressed Council to <br />oppose closing Myrtle Creek but endorsing stop signs being <br />erected. <br /> <br />Mr. Neal Woodard, 925 Myrtle Creek, addressed Council <br />regarding traffic on Myrtle Creek. He suggested that through <br />traffic be allowed on Myrtle Creek during business hours and <br />close the street off on weekends. <br /> <br />Ms. Terri Burton, 905 Shadow Creek, addressed Council and <br />stated that she had witnessed the accident on Myrtle Creek <br />when the little girl was hit, and at that point decided she <br />needed to take some action as far as getting some stop signs <br />or some sort of traffic control there. She has spoken to Mr. <br />Dietert on this problem, and said he informed her that there <br />is no reason the Council cannot put up stop signs on that <br />street. She stated that he said the State does not take <br />jurisdiction within a municipality, that it is the <br />municipality's responsibility and if the municipality deems <br />it necessary to put a stop sign on any corner, that the city <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.