Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council <br />August 28, 1989, Page 3 <br /> <br />may do so as it deems necessary. She stated the warrants <br />listed are for state regulations, and are merely guidelines <br />for municipalities. Mr. Dietert informed her that the state <br />will come and do a road survey at the Myrtle Creek location, <br />but he is not happy about it. She quoted from the list of <br />general provisions that had been sent to her, which stated <br />that "the provisions of this manual may be standards for <br />traffic devices installed, but not a legal requirement for <br />installation." She also quoted other provisions, dealing with <br />high speed, restricted view, and serious accident records in <br />regards to traffic controls being installed. She offered to <br />let any member of Council look at her paper work. <br /> <br />Mrs. Paula Bridges, 813 River Creek, addressed Council stating <br />that she had spent 8 and one-half years trying to get some <br />kind of traffic control on Myrtle Creek. She inquired why, <br />(since there had been nothing done on Myrtle Creek) in April <br />of 1987, a stop sign, a 4-way stop, put at the intersection <br />of Shell Rock and Wilmont? She said there had been no traffic <br />study at that time, no traffic count, no warrant - the reason <br />for that stop sign was "restricted view, many near accidents." <br />She wanted to know why Fairmont Park West does not need the <br />same requirements for a 4-way stop sign that Creekmont <br />subdivision needs. <br /> <br />6. Mr. Berdon Lawrence, Chairman of the Visions '89 Committee, <br />presented the final report to Council. He gave a brief <br />summary of each subcommittee's report, and complimented the <br />hard work each of the committees had done. He is proud of the <br />report, and it is something the City should be proud of. It <br />shows far reaching vision for City planning, and he hopes it <br />will be acted upon. <br /> <br />7. Council considered an ordinance appointing members to Position <br />2 and position 3 of the La Porte Planning and Zoning <br />commission. <br /> <br />It was requested that this item be taken to executive session. <br /> <br />8. Council considered an ordinance appointing members to Position <br />3, Position 4, and Position 5 of the La Porte Area Water <br />Authority. <br /> <br />The City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 1662 - AN ORDINANCE <br />APPOINTING A DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, A DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, <br />AND A DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, OF THE LA PORTE AREA WATER <br />AUTHORITY, FOR A TERM TO EXPIRE SEPTEMBER 1, 1991; CONTAINING <br />A REPEALING CLAUSE; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS <br />LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. <br />