Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e e <br /> Minutes, Regular Meeting and citizens Participation Meeting <br /> La Porte City council <br /> December 14, 1992, Page 6 <br /> Myrtle Creek, which would indicate two-way traffic with no <br /> passing allowed. If this is not sufficient to slow traffic, <br /> a solid white stripe 8 feet from the curb on each side, with <br /> rumble strips can be added at a later date. Traffic control <br /> will also be done frequently to see if the plan is working. <br /> Mr. Howard Ebow addressed Council expressing concern that the <br /> white stripe might encourage people to park on the street, <br /> which would pose a problem of children running into the street <br /> between parked cars. They just want to solve the problems <br /> they have, not create further problems. He understands the <br /> City's position as far as liability. <br /> Mr. Paul Parks, current president of the Creekmont Homeowners <br /> Association, addressed Council indicating his concern over the <br /> cost of implementing and maintaining the proposed plan for <br /> Myrtle Creek. He still feels stop signs would accomplish <br /> their main goal, which is to make the "hump" more safe. Also, <br /> stop signs would give residents living on Myrtle Creek a <br /> little bit of a "window" to be able to get in and out of their <br /> driveway. <br /> Councilperson Cooper feels that stop signs on both sides of <br /> the "hump" could be seen, and that would be his preference. <br /> He quoted a section of Vernon's Statutes, which indicated that <br /> municipalities could install stopping devices wherever they <br /> deemed them necessary. His position on stop signs has not <br /> changed, but the solution depends on what the majority of <br /> Council wants to do. <br /> Councilperson Maxwell complimented staff and steve Gillett on <br /> the survey, and his opinion is that the striping will slow <br /> people down. <br /> Councilperson Thrower appreciated the efforts that steve and <br /> Chief Powell had put into the study, but feels it has been <br /> studied long enough. At this point in time the Council should <br /> do something to help the people out there. <br /> Councilperson Sutherland feels the problem is at its worst <br /> right now because of the construction going on. Once <br /> Underwood is four-lane and Spencer Highway is through, it will <br /> not be a serious problem. It should be a short-term problem, <br /> probably two years. If stop signs are put up, they could also <br /> be taken down at the proper time. He doesn't think massive <br /> controls on city streets, at a cost of a tremendous amount of <br /> money, is the answer. He feels focusing a little personal <br /> attention and gi ving them backup signage for a short term <br /> would be the way to go. <br />