Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Minutes Public Hearing and <br />Regular Meeting <br />La Porte City Council <br />August 14, 1995, Page 7 <br /> <br />K. ORDINANCE 95-2055 - structure located at 10507 N. H <br />street Tr. 461A; La Porte Outlots, owner Olive Herring Trabue <br />c/o Norman Payne <br /> <br />L. ORDINANCE 95-2056 - Pulled for Council discussion <br /> <br />M. ORDINANCE 95-2057 - Pulled before the Council meeting by <br />staff due to demolition of structure by owner (Item N. will <br />now become Ordinance 95-2057) <br /> <br />N. ORDINANCE 95-2057 - structure located at 515 (known as <br />517 by owner) S. 4th street Blk. 112; Lots 10, 11; Town of La <br />Porte, owners Mary Martin; Charlie Martin; Daniel A. Miller <br />(Item O. will now become Ordinance 95-2058) <br /> <br />O. ORDINANCE 95-2058 - Pulled before the Council meeting by <br />staff due to demolishing of structure by owner (Item P will <br />now become Ordinance 95-2058) <br /> <br />P. ORDINANCE 95-2058 - structure located at 611 S. Iowa <br />street Blk. 251; S. 15' of Lot 5 and Lot 6 and N. 20' of Lot <br />7; Town of La Porte, owner Robert L. Browning <br /> <br />Motion was made by Councilperson Clarke to vote on items A. B. <br />C. D. E. F. H. I. J. K. Nand P on a consent agenda declarinq <br />these buildinqs a nuisance. and orderinq such buildinqs <br />condemned. Second by Councilperson Cooper. The motion <br />carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays. <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, <br />McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke <br />Malone <br />None <br /> <br />Thrower, <br />and Mayor <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Council then discussed Ordinance 95-2051, Item G, structure <br />located at Crescent & Bay Street. <br /> <br />Motion was made by CouncilDerson COODer to denv Ordinance 95- <br />2051 and brinq back next vear. Second by Councilperson Gay. <br />During discussion by council, Councilperson Gay stated he <br />thought his second was for discussion of Ordinance 95-2051. <br />councilperson Sutherland stated, "Let the record show I will <br />second the motion to deny Ordinance 95-2051". The motion to <br />deny destruction of Item G. failed, 4 ayes and 5 nays. <br />