Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />Minutes Public Hearing <br />and Regular Meeting <br />La Porte City Council <br />September 23, 1996, Page 7 <br /> <br />for this community, regulations that the State will allow. The State does put municipalities in a <br />position to regulate those businesses but does not put municipalities in a position to completely <br />keep them out of their community." City Attorney Knox Askins verified Mr. Joerns statement <br />by stating, "That is correct". Council discussed the issue in length. They reviewed area maps <br />which indicated the areas where the H-I Zones are located, where the sexually oriented businesses <br />would be allowed to operate, and where they would be least intrusive to residential areas. City <br />Attorney Knox Askins explained the merits of the wording of the ordinance and stated, "It is our <br />belief there are no existing Sexually Oriented Businesses in the City of La Porte today which <br />meet the definitions and criteria contained in the proposed ordinance, and we feel this wording <br />will protect us in the future" . <br /> <br />City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 1501-U - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE 1501, THE ZONING <br />ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE BY ADDING A NEW PART REGULATING <br />ADULT ORIENTED BUSINESSES; AMENDING DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW <br />ADULT ORIENTED BUSINESSES IN AN H-1 ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A <br />PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS OF LOCATION <br />REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF <br />$500.00 FOR ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; <br />FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Councilperson Thrower to approve Ordinance 1501-U as read by the <br />City Attorney. Second by Councilperson Porter. The motion carried, 8 ayes, 1 nay. <br /> <br />Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke and <br />Mayor Malone <br />Nays: Councilperson Cooper <br /> <br />9. CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1285, AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING <br />POLICEMEN'S CIVIL SERVICE, ESTABLISlDNG CLASSIFICATIONS; NUMBER OF <br />AUTHORIZING POSITIONS IN EACH CLASSIFICATION (Ord. 1285-M) - L. Rigby <br /> <br />Director of Administrative Services Louis Rigby reviewed the summary and recommendation for <br />the request. Mr. Rigby reported any time there is a change to ordinance 1285 we have to amend <br />the original ordinance. Although it is not reflected in the agenda request, Ordinance 1285-M <br />does include one Police Officer, one Assistant Chief, and one Lieutenant. <br /> <br />City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 1285-M - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE <br />NO. 1285, "AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING POLICEMEN'S CIVIL SERVICE; <br />ESTABLISHING CLASSIFICATIONS; NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED POSmONS IN EACH <br />CLASSIFICATION; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; FINDING COMPLIANCE <br />WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF" . <br />