My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1998-11-23 Regular and Workshop Meeting of City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1990's
>
1998
>
1998-11-23 Regular and Workshop Meeting of City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:10 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:54:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/23/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 98-15 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF VOLUNTARY CLASS <br />ACTIONS ON BEHALF OF TEXAS MUNICIPAliTIES <br /> <br />. . . . <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it has come to the City's attention that Texas cities have historically participated in class action <br />lawsuits in this state; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Texas cities routinely benefit from collaborative proceedings and coalition building fostered and <br />promoted by class action suits for collective good of their citizens; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, they are presently a nwnber of pending class actions suits filed on behalf of Texas cities, <br />including, but not limited to the following: <br /> <br />City of Wbarton, et aL v. Houston Lighting & Power Company, et <br />81; Cause No. 96-016613; pending in Harris County, Texas; <br /> <br />City of Pharr, et aI. v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Company, et aI; <br />Cause No, C-4558-96-A-2; pending in Hidalgo County, Texas; and <br /> <br />City ofPearIand, et aL v. Noram Energy Corporation, Cause No. <br />313I-JG97, pending in Brazoria County, Texas; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Texas cities have historically exercised their own decisions regarding whether to remain in or <br />opt out of class action suits med in this state and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, we :find it to be in the best interest of our City to retain the right, privilege and option to remain <br />in and/or opt out ofvoluntmy class action suits filed in the State of Texas and which are or may be filed on behalf <br />of Texas cities; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, nothing in this Resolution is inteqded to nor does it obligate our City to participate in any future <br />class action suits that may be filed, but rater the City expressly retains its right and option to opt out of any class <br />actions suit, according to law. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED that the City by and through its elected <br />officials, find it to be good public policy for Texas cities to have the option, right and privilege to participate or not <br />participate in voluntary class action suits and to make their own decisions as to whether to remain in or opt out of <br />any existing or future class action suits that may be filed. Thus, this City, therefore approves all pending class <br />action suits in which it has voluntarily opted to remain a class member and those suits in which it may in the future <br />choose to be a voluntmy-member as provided for in Rule 42, Tex. R. Civ. P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.