1999-03-15 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of La Porte City Council

Browse Search

e e Comments on the Protective Covenants 1. In Section 1, Permitted Uses, we need to refer to the General Plan and Exhibit "0" of the Development Agreement for a list of permitted uses and delete all other references to permitted uses in Section 1. 2. Whenever there is conflict between the Protective Covenants, Special Conditional Use Permit, and/or the Development Agreement, the terms of the Development Agreement will control. 3. Under Section 3, Architectural and Design Control, delete inserted reference to "not considered architecturally finished" and a reference needs to be added that "no metal buildings shall be permitted." 4. Under Section 9, Screening, a provision needs to be added that screening will be provided for truck courts which face Powell Road and/or State Highway 146. 5. Under Section 12, Signs, Consistent with the terms of the Development Agreement, signage for the track shall be uniform and shall follow a consistent design throughout the development. A sign consultant shall be utilized to develop such uniform and consistent signage plan throughout the track and the plan that is developed shall be approved by the City of La Porte and be enforced throughout the track by the Association. No deviation in signage shall be perm itted except by recommendation of the Board of the Association, and approved by the Planning Director of the City of La Porte upon such recommendation. 6. Under Section 24, Conflict with Deeds of Conveyance. Add another reference to my previous comment that the Development Agreement governs between conflicts and this document and the Development Agreement and/or Special Conditional Uses.