Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Notes for 1-24-00 5 Minute City Council Presentation <br />I speak with you tonight as a coordinator for "COMMON SENSE GOVERNMENT". <br />a. We are the citizens from 3 subdivisions who organized and petitioned to stop a <br />proposed "highway" or Underwood type road through our neighborhoods. <br />b. I'd like to review the Phase 1 Road status. <br />2. First a brief recap of events: <br />a. City~Council responded to ow petition of 576 citizens by passing an ordinance~to <br />cancel Phase 1 funding for orie year for the purpose of letting the citizens decide the <br />issue in the Comprehensive Plan review. <br />b. The issue was decided; decisively and overwhelmingly. The Phase one road was <br />removed from the Comprehensive Plan. COMMON SENSE GOVERNMENT <br />prevailed through the entire process and through the maneuvers intended to limit our <br />participation. <br />c. Through the entire review process the only citizen speaking in favor of the Phase 1 <br />Road was a Creekmont resident that mentioned at the Sylvan Beach general <br />meeting, transportation section, that she would like the Phase 1 Road because she <br />thought it would take traffic off her street of Mertle Creek)... And we responded by <br />stating that it was wrong for her to try to move her traffic problem over to~ our <br />neighborhoods. <br />3. COMMON SENSE GO would like to thank those members of Council <br />that have kept their agreement and contract with the citizens on this issue. <br />4. COMMON SENSE GOVE~ would like to reaffirm to this Council our <br />resolve and determination to stop the proposed Phase 1 Road that endangers the safety <br />of our children and citizens, our property values, and our neighborhood environments. <br />5. Last fall some council members attempted to refitnd the Phase 1 Road in disregard of <br />the Council's agreement with the citizens. In response to that attempted refunding of <br />the Phase 1 Road; COMMON SENSE GO ~~ is registering as a general <br />purpose Political Action Committee (PAC) with the State of Texas. <br />6. If we have to petition again; regarding the Phase 1 Road; that petition will include <br />other items such as the cost of the City's legal service, the City's salary structure, the <br />City's handling of the Ned Holmes container terminal, and the City's voter district <br />representation ratio . We think this will bring broad base support for our petition, <br />although the petition will only require about 500 names to be legally binding.......... <br />... BECAUSE THE PETITION WILL BE FOR A REFERENDUM OF RECALL <br />of any Council member that attempts to violate the Council's agreement <br />with the citizens. <br />Thank You for Your Time and Consideration of This Issue, <br />Bill Scott, 281-470-6685, scottl@hal-pc.org <br />