My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2001-03-19 Special Called Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2001
>
2001-03-19 Special Called Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:14 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:59:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/19/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Good Evening Council and Fellow Citizens, <br />I'm Clarence Morgan. My Wife and I live at 10415 N. Ave. H <br /> <br />I'd like to comment on 3 items regarding the Farrington extension. <br /> <br />1. . A recent Bay Shore Sun Article states it is very likely that Fire Station # 2, <br />located across from the airport, will move to Underwood Rd. and Fire Station <br />#3,located on Lomax School Rd. will move toward Sens Rd. A study of the <br />City Map proves that when this happens; The suggested but unproven need <br />for the proposed Farrington extension for backup response disappears. <br />We have already proven that EMS will not benefit from the Farrington <br />extension because it is located on C street. It turns right into Lomax or Left to <br />the other areas. EMS will be unaffected by the move to Underwood Rd. <br /> <br />2. A few weeks ago a .twin engine airplane crashed on the West end of <br />the airport, just yards from Farrington Rd. This should drive home the fact <br />that the RPZ is a very unsafe place. We have repeatedly provided you with <br />the written mandatory FAA design standards and documented conversations <br />with FAA and TEXDOT officials that prove this road is a violation of the intent <br />and the letter of the design standards. The design standard information we <br />gave you has a chart that shows the % of airplane overruns & undershoots. <br />This proves that another crash will occur. Will it be into a bus load of <br />children or a house? We have studied the original grant contract between <br />the City and TEXDOT and it proves again that Mr. Guttery, who has said <br />this road is OK; is completely wrong in his written statement about the <br />design standards. The contract also states that the U.S. and Texas are <br />NOT "responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons which <br />may arise from, or be incident to, compliance with this grant agreement". <br />THAT MAKES THE CITY TOTALLY LIABLE AND RESPONSIBLE WHEN <br />THE NEXT CRASH OCCURS. <br /> <br />3. We understand some Glen Meadows residents want to connect Valley <br />Brook to H street as an alternative to the Farrington Extension. We have <br />studied this proposal using a city map and also driving the area. We conclude <br />that drivers from approximately 400 homes in the North half of Glen Meadows <br />would use the Valley Brook extension to cut through Lomax to 225 rather than <br />use Spencer Hwy as they are supposed to. These drivers would cut through a <br />neighborhood where the residents would have to back out into this cut through <br />traffic, where the residents would have to mix with the cut through traffic in the <br />street as they walk, jog, bicycle, ride horses, etc. because Lomax's'main <br />streets have very steep ditches, narrow shoulders, and no sidewalks. This <br />would make an already dangerous and unsafe situation much worse. <br /> <br />Thanks for listening, <br /> <br />~ '{Ju;t;r- <br />Clarence Morgan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.