My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2001-10-22 Regular Meeting and Public Hearings
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2001
>
2001-10-22 Regular Meeting and Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:15 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/22/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Council Minutes 10-22-01 - Page 5 <br /> <br />La Porte; but Resolution Number II says if the numbers are as they are estimated to be <br />within 20 to 25 percent lower than what we are currently purchasing, then the City will <br />move forward and enter into a contract. In talking with one of the H- <br />GAC board members today, it's my understanding there may even be a greater <br />percentage break for La Porte and other cities that participate. <br /> <br />So, the Resolution that you are asked to consider will allow the City to go ahead and <br />purchase when the time comes, the rates as they have been established through the <br />bid process through H-GACj if and only if the numbers are lower than what I <br />quoted tonight or are equal to what I quoted tonight. If you are inclined to do so, <br />then you are also asked by this Resolution to appoint two officers from the City to <br />sit down and to negotiate the final numbers with H-GAC. I would recommend that <br />we move forward, and that those two people be myself and our Purchasing Agent. <br />Susan Kelley has been working on this particular project almost since its inceptionj <br />and she has done a tremendous job, by the way. I'm very proud of her efforts to <br />date. We do recommend that Resolution Number II be approved and accepted by <br />the City Council. We are ready to answer any questions we possibly can. <br /> <br />Alton Porter's question waSj if after this is done, can we withdraw our commitment <br />to fixed rate, if final pricing exceeds the initial proposed pricing. Is that the only opt <br />out we have? If service is poor, do we have an opt out? <br /> <br />Mr. Herrera responded that their is a supplemental agreement in the packet that <br />does talk of a termination clause. In order to get in to it, first of all; the first clause <br />is not service, but the price. If the price is not acceptable, then you can back out. <br />The contract that we will probably negotiate will either be for one year or for two <br />years. At this point and time, a firm of TXU has been recognized as the apparent <br />low bidder, or the most responsible bidder. There is a term clause in the sample <br />agreement that talks about (Termination of Agreement). We would probably have <br />to go through breech of contract, and explain where the breech was at and why we <br />are dissatisfied. <br /> <br />There were various members discussing the contract agreement. <br /> <br />City Attorney read: RESOLUTION 2001-14 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND <br />AUTHROIZING EXECUTION OF A "SUPPLY AGREEMENT" WITH A RETAIL <br />ELECTRIC PROVIDER, APPROVING INITIAL PROPOSAL PRICING, AND <br />APPOINTING AUTHORIZED REPRESENT A TIVE(S). <br /> <br />Motion was made by Councilperson Sutherland to approve Resolution 2001-14 as <br />presented by Mr. Herrera. Second by Councilperson Griffiths. The motion carried. <br /> <br />Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Warren, Young, Clarke, and Malone. <br />Nays: Porter <br />Abstain: None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.