Laserfiche WebLink
0 • <br />Bayport /Army Corps of Engineers Draft E.I.S. Report <br />It is my belief that we should point out the primary concern with this project at this location <br />and that has to do specifically with us being in a "severe" non -attainment situation with <br />regards to the "Clean Air Act". This alone should be reason to reject this project from an <br />environmental standpoint We have to lower our speed limits to 55 MPH, can only operate <br />lawnmowers (commercially) after noon, various heavy equipment operations are going to be <br />very severely impacted from an operational standpoint, and numerous other restrictions <br />simply because our air is already unacceptable from a health /safety consideration. <br />In addition to this we will be postured to or eit future federal highway funds due to our non - <br />attainment status. Even in the event that we do not forfeit highway funds TxDot is on schedul <br />approximately ten (10) to twelve (12) years behind the Port on infrastructure (road) <br />improvements that are going to be dramatically affected by the port expansion. If we remain a <br />"non -attainment" area not only is this end of Harris County going to suffer from major traffi <br />problems but the entire Houston / Galveston region is going to lase funding far major <br />scheduled road projects. We need to make sure that everyone around us is aware of the very <br />negative effect this is going to have on an economic development standpoint for our entire <br />region. This will more than off -set any positive gains from the port expansion. <br />Again, I believe that this should be the central theme for our approach to the Corps and I <br />believe we should copy the EPA Region VI director, our federal elected officials, and our <br />Governor as well as all local / region city councils and county governments for support. In <br />addition to this I believe that the position paper should be attached that addresses all of the <br />other positions /considerations that we have stated. <br />