My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2003-07-28 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-07-28 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:18 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:03:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/28/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8-11-03 Council Notes <br />I have reviewed the City's fill dirt permits and there were large differences in. <br />permit requirements. One large land owner had to repeatedly come t® City Hall to <br />reapply for the max 40 Load Permit, while the owner of 11306 N L ,located West o~ <br />Exxon's Pipeline; applied for and received a City permit for 40 + loads of dirt; which <br />gave him unlimited loads of dirt. This was the only permit written to. allow unlimited <br />loads of dirt. When that permit expired, the owner got another City permit for 700 <br />loads. His drainage sketch; as you see,~stated the fill would be confined the back half <br />of the property, but fill dirt was spread over the entire property. The sketch states that <br />drainage will be from the edges down to a middle swale, but the reverse occurred. The <br />dirt is high in the middle and drains to the edges. The ordinance test of not draining . <br />onto your neighbor is also violated here. I've walked the East side of this property and <br />there is no swale to keep it from draining onto neighboring property. <br />Now let's look at another flagrant ordinance violation and abuse of neighbors. Some <br />citizens are concerned.that they might flood because of~neighboring fill dirt. Our <br />home site did flood on a regular basis. <br />That lake you see is our 5 acre home site on Lomax School Rd. It is some of the <br />.highest ground in Lomax and did not flood when we bought it. The flooding was <br />caused by the Illegal dam installed to the West by the same group that has the feed lot <br />City permitted for unlimited #s of animals on our South property line. Eor years they <br />have brought in truck loads of sand and dirt and have never applied for a fill dirt <br />permit and continue to violate the City ordinance as they build up their~land to drain <br />onto ours. I have shown you this and you have done nothing. And to add insult to <br />injury, your proposed fill dirt ordinance attempts to cover up for this abuse by <br />allowing people like this to~ bring in up to 5 truck loads of fill every 6 months without <br />any requirements. When fill• dirt is used to increases elevation to drain onto another <br />citizens property or to dam the natural flow of water; the result is the same, whether it <br />is SO loads at once or SO~loads spread. over 5 years. The proposed ordinance is <br />-ambiguous and. vague on this point, and would allow the City's good~~ole boy system . <br />to continue to abuse property owners as I've just shown you. This is~ not just and it <br />points out that this City's system of special favors for City insiders is still operating.. I <br />will no longer tolerate this abuse and I will hold personally responsible those that <br />abide this cover up, and the arrogant, crooked good `ole boy system that produced it. <br />I have an ordinance 2646 question for you personally Mr. Malone. <br />Was the owner of 11306 N L given special City favors because he is chairman of the <br />City's Board of Injustice and also one of your old cronies? , : . <br />Thank You for Your Consideratign. .. , . <br />Bill Scott ,, '~` <br />. 1 i~ • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.