My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2004-02-09 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-02-09 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 10:41:59 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:03:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 0 <br />City Council Regular Meeting and Public Hearing — February 9, 2004 - Page 2 <br />Motion was made by Councilmember Mosteit to vote on items B. C & D together. Second by Peter <br />Griffiths. The motion carried. <br />Ayes: Engelken, Griffiths, Mosteit, Young, Ebow, Warren, Meismer, Beasley and Malone <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />5. PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES, COMMUNICATIONS, AND CITIZENS AND <br />TAX PAYERS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM POSTED ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />Ms. Nancy McNabb of 4517 Goodfellow, Dallas, Texas 75229, a representative of NFPA, took the <br />opportunity to thank the Ad Hoc Committee for recommending the C-3 Codes and offer any needed <br />assistance. <br />Ed Yung of 230 Jefferson, La Porte, Texas 77571, deferred speaking, allowing Carlos Smith to speak. <br />Jim Zoller of 907 Hackberry, La Porte, Texas 77571, addressed.City Council and spoke in favor of the <br />Special Conditional Use permit being considered this evening. <br />Bill White of 10331 Collingswood, La Porte, Texas 77571, deferred speaking, allowing Carlos Smith to <br />speak. <br />Bobby Schlenk of 620 South 4'h Street, La Porte, Texas 77571, had a few questions regarding the <br />moratorium: <br />- Why wasn't each property owner contacted and asked their opinion on this issue. <br />- Mr. Schlenk understood that zoning will be changed for the downtown area to meet different building codes. <br />- Is this true, and if so, what kind of changes? <br />- Will new permits be needed for existing buildings or new permits for anything that has a permit issued? <br />within the last six months? <br />- All three of his properties were an eyesore of the Main Street District at one time, my wife and he worked <br />very hard to clean up these properties. This was all done with personal funding; to restore and beautify La <br />Porte. These properties were on the demolition list to be torn down or they just needed some love and care. <br />- Mr. Schlenk resents a handful of people dictating what he can and cannot do with his own property, <br />especially when all my efforts have been in beautifying and restoring La Porte. <br />Bill Scott of 1802 Lomax School Road, La Porte, Texas 77571, intended to expose more of the false <br />statements in the Board of Adjustment (BOA) findings of fact regarding the feedlot next to his property. <br />However, Mr. Scott spoke instead in opposition of the Special Conditional Use (SCU) Permit and brought up <br />the following points: <br />- A 6000 square foot building, where the limit is 2000 square feet, this issue started as a variance before the <br />BOA and progressed to its current status of SCU Permit, associated with a Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD). <br />- The Zoning Ordinance PUD Section 636, the procedures are intended to be used in two ways. The City <br />Attorney should have apprised you of all the details. If you study the intended uses, this issue does not fall <br />under either intended use. The obvious conclusion is this section was either very poorly written, or needs to <br />be rewritten. <br />- Zoning Ordinance Section 656.F.10 is a very critical part of your City Council decision criteria on this <br />matter, which Council should have been informed by the City Attorney. These items need to be adhered to <br />as part of the quality under the law or changed in the Zoning Ordinance. The real issue is how the Board <br />handled the variance. <br />- Mr. Zoller, in his letter to the editor of the `Bayshore Sun", pointed out several specific clear items of law <br />that the BOA ignored and its handling of the variance. Mr. Scott researched Mr. Zoller's claims and agrees <br />with him. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.