My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2004-02-23 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-02-23 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:19 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:03:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting - Febr~ 23, 2004 -Page 3 • <br />deep. This 4'S" gully, the City dug in front of our property, is on the same street, under the same drainage <br />scenario as the Blackwell's nice shallow ditch with the illegal culvert. This gully stands in water a lot because <br />the City came back and dug the gully even deeper than it already was; while they did not clean out the City <br />culvert and ditch, which was at the root of the problem. In fact, they dug their ditch so deep that it was below <br />the level of the City culvert that it drains into so the water stands. This gully exists because the City took care <br />of the Blackwell's to the north of us, but they also took care of them to the south by making the entrance to <br />their feedlot a drainage high point; even though our property is the physical middle of the drainage, the higher <br />elevation and the logical high point. When they started down south to make Blackwell's the high point, by the <br />time they got to us, we had a 5' deep ditch. A few months after I brought this injustice to Council, the City <br />responded by digging the ditch in front of our property even wider. The obvious 2646 questions are: Why did <br />the City help Bobby Blackwell violate the law? Why did the City dig the ditch wider in front of their property <br />when they knew it was too wide and too deep already? Justice demands that Mr. Scott get the same justice as <br />the Blackwell's. <br />Eddie Hollub of 4828 Pine, Pasadena, Texas, Modern Plumbing Company (a non-union shop), would like to <br />stop some rumors real quick. First of all, the codes are union and non-union, but that shouldn't be the issue. A <br />good quality code that we all live by is a very fair playing field. The C3 Code has stood up for years, a good <br />code. If a job fails, it is on him. The code protects him, his company and his family. <br />Bill White of 10331 Collingswood, La Porte, Texas 77571, has been in the construction business for over 60 <br />years. During that time, the ICC codes always did their job, they are developed to give the minimum amount <br />and you can always go above it. Mr. White highly recommends that you keep the ICC codes. <br />6. Council to consider approval or other action regarding an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a <br />Pipeline Adjustment Agreement with Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline, L.P. for $516,321. <br />Public Works Director Steve Gillett presented summary and recommendation and answered Council's <br />questions. <br />Assistant City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 2004-2706 - AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND <br />AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND KINDER MORGAN <br />TEJAS PIPELINE, L.P., TO PROVIDE PIPELINE ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE CANADA ROAD <br />PROJECT; APPROPRIATING THE SUM NOT TO EXCEED $516,321.00, TO FUND SAID CONTRACT; <br />MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING <br />COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE <br />HEREOF. <br />Motion was made by Councilmember Engelken to approve Ordinance 2004-2706 as presented by Mr. Gillett. <br />Second by Councilmember Ebow. The motion carved. <br />Ayes: Engelken, Beasley, Griffiths, Mosteit, Young, Ebow, Meismer and Malone <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />7. Council to consider approval or other action regarding approving a Construction Code Adoption Ordinance. <br />Ad~ Hoc Committee Chairman Mike Clausen informed Council he had no additional comments since his last <br />address to Mayor and Council. He informed Mayor and City Council the majority of the Ad Hoc Committee <br />.recommends the~C3 Codes. <br />Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong read: ORDINANCE 96-2079-B - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING <br />NEW BUILDING CODES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 82 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE <br />CITY OF LA PORTE; BY AMENDING CHAPTER 82, "BUILDINGS AND BUII,DING REGULATIONS", <br />ARTICLE II "BUILDING CODES", SECTION 82-31 "ADOPTION'; SECTIONS 82-32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.