Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting - April 12, 2004 - Page 6 <br /> <br />C. John Joerns gave direction on the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs regarding <br />notifications for housing tax credit projects in La Porte. There have been three from the state, with two <br />more which are a little different. There are two separate programs; the first three projects are Bay Forest <br />Ranch, which is within our Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone; Fair Mist Apartments, proposed for future <br />Canada Road area, and Alexander Ridge near Spencer Highway and Sens Road. Tonight, House Bill 3546 <br />will be discussed regarding taxation issues. <br /> <br />Bay Forest and Fair Mist include proposed funding and ownership by Harris County Housing Authority, if <br />that were to occur, and the projects progressed through the system, with Harris County being the owner, <br />they would be removed from the City's tax rolls. <br /> <br />One of the property's is in TIRZ, the combined tax increment ($2.73/per $100/evaluation) with the Bay <br />Forest Ranch project proposing 104 bedroom units and the estimated value being $8.5 million. For this <br />project, all things remaining consistent, with taxing structures remaining in place, that would amount to <br />over $5 million for the remaining 23 years life of the TIRZ. For the project on Canada Road, with the <br />City increment only, would amount to $60,350/per year. <br /> <br />House Bill 3546 establishes an appraisal process to be used by the Chief Appraiser, indicating the Chief <br />Appraiser will include the income approach in developing future appraised value of these projects. We <br />have been led to believe that will be a lower value than what would be land evaluation of buildings and <br />improvements and may lower the anticipated tax revenues generated from these types of projects. <br /> <br />Harris County and the Housing Authority are discussing a program where the Authority guarantees and <br />makes payments in lieu of taxes to make those entities whole again. <br /> <br />David Turkel, Administrator of Harris County Housing & Economic Development, provided information <br />of the Harris County Housing Authority and welcomed questions from Council and Staff, and encouraged <br />development of new properties. <br /> <br />Councilmember Meismer questioned that Mr. Turkel alluded to payments in lieu and that type of thing, <br />thinking one of our biggest concerns is, there is no doubt in the way this is proposed that we are going to <br />lose the ability to have the taxable value of those properties on the Tax Roll to some degree or ifnot in <br />whole. We are still going to have the responsibilities for providing services for those houses and facilities; <br />which will be very much an uphill battle. For someone to consider that if that's not a plan upfront, what is <br />that proposed shared entity, what is that going to be, what does that mean in dollars and cents. Nobody is <br />willing to sign a blank check and that's what we are being asked to do at this point. <br /> <br />Mr. Turkel responded that at this point all we are really asking Council to approve, in this case, are two <br />new affordable housing developments. Now, it is true that all across the country that tax credit housing <br />works and provides the most modem and up-to-date housing with all the amenities. The finest apartment <br />projects around can be at rates that are below market, simply because of the tax credits that the developers <br />receive from the Internal Revenue Service, allowing them to build the project for something less than <br />normal construction costs. Since the developers have to agree to long term rent controls, the cash flow of <br />the projects are restricted. This is the reason the appraisal districts are appraising them based on income <br />rather than reproduction costs, because ultimately all of these types of projects are only worth the amount <br />of money that they will bring in. If you have a rent control project, it will mean ifit were sold on the open <br />market with those controls in place, it would not bring the same amount as such a project would without <br />the controls. <br /> <br />Mr. Meismer stated that he understands that, but given that, if this property was developed in another <br />format without those, we quite possibly would not only see a higher tax base, but a substantially higher tax <br />base, so we are being asked to give up on the front end. <br />