Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br />Agenda Date Requested: <br /> <br />~ber 8, 2004 <br /> <br />Appropriation <br /> <br />Requested By: Wayne Saho <br /> <br />Source of Funds: <br /> <br />Department: PllUIDiDII <br /> <br />Account Number: <br /> <br />Report: X Resolution: <br /> <br />Ordinance: <br /> <br />Amount Budgeted: <br /> <br />Exhibit 1: <br /> <br />Front Foot Fee Summary <br /> <br />Amount Requested: <br /> <br />Exhibit 2: <br /> <br />Proposed Front Foot Fee Application <br /> <br />Budgeted Item: YES NO <br /> <br />Exhibit 3: <br /> <br />Current Front Foot Fee Application <br /> <br />Exhibit 4: <br /> <br />Backup Maps for New Calculations <br /> <br />SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />At the Oty Council's direction staff, before an open Council meeting, is bringing the possibility of updating front <br />foot fees charged for businesses and residences seeking water and sewer services. These fees were originally <br />established by Ordinance No. 759 in 1976 and were later amended by Ordinance 759-F in 1990. They have not <br />been updated in the past 14 years. The result of the recent review of the front foot fees was to establish new updated <br />fees in-line with actual development costs and modem day installation and material costs. <br /> <br />The data found in the exhibits seeks to provide to Council what the fees would be given modem day pri~g. It <br />would be Council's discretion to update the front foot fees at a later date. . <br /> <br />The front foot fees in today's dollars would be as follows: <br /> <br />Commercial <br />Residential <br /> <br />WATER <br />$8.42/100 sq. ft. <br />$8.42/100 sq. ft. <br /> <br />SEWER <br />$15.101100 sq. ft. <br />$9.42/100 sq. ft. <br /> <br />These mte would be for lots of square footage of up to 10,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Staff seeks direction from Council on the updating.of the front foot fees to those listed above to rates reflective of <br />current construction costs. Staff recommends that residentiJd extended acreage lots be treated separately as the <br />computation of front foot fees for them are different - this is presented in a separate discussion item for Council. A <br />public hearing is not required. <br /> <br />Action Reauired bv Council: <br /> <br />Provide direction to staff on the future adoptio~ of updated front foot fees for commercial and residential <br />development. <br /> <br />. <br />ADD roved for City Council Ae:enda <br /> <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />/(<1-0L <br /> <br />Date <br />