My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2005-05-16 Special Called Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-05-16 Special Called Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:20 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/16/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MAY 20 '05 15:29 FR <br /> <br />1 TO 8~2818421259 <br /> <br />P. 01/04 <br /> <br />Cities would lose all in-kind services Certain in-kind benefits-free access to <br />currently required in cable franchises if this cable broadba~d networks and cable TV <br />bill passes. service-would be extended through the <br /> earlier of either 2015 or the expiration of <br /> the current franchise. <br /> The bill would eliminate in"!kind items that <br /> drive up the price of cable service - for <br /> example, annual cash payments to cities. <br />Cable rates will go up if this bill passes. If anything, they should finally go down <br /> as monopoly cable companies are forced to <br /> compete. <br />School districts will no longer enjoy free Under sa 408, free cable service to <br />cable TV service if this bill passes. schools would be extended through the <br /> earlier of 20 15 or franchise expiration. <br />Even if the phone companies are granted. a This is wrong. Federal law gives the state <br />statewide franchise, cable companies are tbe authority to determine whether <br />still obligated under federal law to obtain franchises are granted at the state or <br />local video franchises. local level. It does not require both. <br />Cities will never realize the full benefits of Common sense would suggest it is in <br />competition in the video market since the phone companies' best interests to quickly <br />phone companies can pick and choose roll out video to as many consumers as <br />whom they serve. possible. sac has stated it plans to reach <br /> 50% of its customers within three years. <br /> Cable is applying a double standard on this <br /> issue-especially when its introduction of <br /> digital phone service has been less than <br /> ubiquitous. <br />The status quo is better for cities. SB 408 provides a unique opportunity for <br /> cities to stabilize-and perhaps even grow-- <br /> video franchise revenues. Taking no <br /> action wiD lower city revenues as <br /> wireless does not pay fees to cities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.