My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2005-05-16 Special Called Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-05-16 Special Called Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:20 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/16/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r MAY-17-05 TUE 11:08 AM TEXA.s..MUNICIPAL LEAGUE <br /> <br />FAX NO. 51~317490 <br /> <br />P. 03 <br /> <br />H.B. 2833 . VOTE NO! <br /> <br />. What is the main reason that cities are formed? <br /> <br />To protect property values and to prohibit negative activities for the common good. <br /> <br />. Do cities impose regulations that reduce the value of some owner's property? <br /> <br />Yes. For example, many cities prohibit sexually oriented businesses in certain <br />areas. That prohibition means that a landowner may not be able to realize the <br />profits he or she planned for by opening a strip club. <br /> <br />. Are there protections in current law that allow a landowner to be <br />compensated when city regulations go to far? <br /> <br />Yes, both the Texas and United States Supreme Courts bave adopted a balancing <br />test that weighs the interests of an individual landowner and the public-at-large. <br /> <br />. What mandates does H.B. 2833 impose on cities? <br /> <br />The bill requires a city to pay for a detailed report (a "takings impact assessment") <br />as to why any regulation that might reduce the value of property is being <br />considered. Also, if the regulation reduces the value of an individual's property <br />(with nO concern about how it protects the surrounding properties)) a city is <br />required to use taxpayer funds to subsidize that individual. <br /> <br />. What is an example of how ridiculous and impossible it would be for a city to <br />comply with the bill? <br /> <br />If a city wants to impose a smoking ordinance, it must prepare a detailed report on <br />how tbe ordinance might affect each individual property in the city. And if the <br />ordinance might (according to whom?) reduce the value of one or all of those <br />properties, tIle city would have to pay cash to each and every business owner in the <br />city. <br /> <br />. Will floor amendments fix the bill? <br /> <br />No. H.B. 2833, in any form, is bad public policy and creates too much uncertainty <br />for city taxpayers, resulting in a "full-employment acf' for trial lawyers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.