My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2006-10-09 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-10-09 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:32:45 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:09:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/9/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular and Workshop Meeting —October 9, 2006 <br />Page 8 <br />Councilmember Howard Ebow wanted to clarify that the amount he understood it to be was <br />$183,000.00. <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns noted no, because at the budget hearing, staff had <br />proposed at 15% increase on the employee and City side. Council directed staff at that time <br />to absorb the 15% employee increase. That amount was $83,000.00. <br />Mayor noted of employee and retiree costs. <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns indicated yes. Mr. Joerns noted he understood the <br />question from last weeks meeting to be what would the impact be if we froze retiree costs. <br />He noted the impact was the additional $171,000.00 for this plan year only. The costs would <br />continue to increase in future plan year. <br />Councilmember Moser inquired as to if the $171,000.00 for retirees was for the next plan <br />year. <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns noted that would be the amount if retiree rates were <br />frozen. <br />Councilmember Moser inquired if the $170.000.00 was for the retirees if we freeze the 15%? <br />Mayor Porter indicated no it was the increase if we froze retiree rates. <br />Councilmember Griffiths noted in 2008, we either freeze the retirees or they would receive a <br />huge increase at that time. <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns noted the increase would be to keep the plan solvent. In <br />addition, he reminded Council there would continue to be increases each plan year. <br />Councilmember Griffiths noted it would be great to freeze retiree rates but it would be very <br />costly and costs would continue to increase in future plan years. <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns noted if Council directs staff to freeze retiree rates, we <br />would start off a $253,000 subsidy before we look at any other medical trends. <br />Councilmember Moser inquired we are up to $253,000.00 now. <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns noted he jumped ahead to the next plan year. We are <br />already $253,000.00 in the hole from the recommended funding levels for this year. <br />Councilmember Moser inquired recommended by? <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns noted when we started off on the budget, when the <br />administration provided that recommendation. Next fund year you are starting off <br />$253,000.00 before the recommended funding level. It gets back to what we discussed the <br />night of the public hearings. It is targeting the health fund with the number of working days <br />capitol and having a healthy fund balance. You would always be starting off that much in <br />the hole for the next plan year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.