My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2006-10-09 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-10-09 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:32:45 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:09:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/9/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular and Workshop Meeting —October 9, 2006 <br />Page 12 <br />absorbing all of this. It is not happening at other places and is going to be a serious impact <br />on us. On the defense, I think with us being a self insured pool, allowing a deferral without <br />having some kind of umbrella or cushion to catch up at 65 that we have the potential on our <br />comp loss coverage to get out of hand with catastrophic results. This self insured pool could <br />get in worse damage than it is now. Again, I agree with the deferral and I have serious <br />reservations about it if your options are before 65 where medicare would provide us a <br />cushion. I plan on voting for it but have serious reservations. We better do a lot of soul <br />searching before we come back here next year on how we are going to handle this problem. <br />It is not going to stop here tonight. <br />With no other discussions, I will take a vote. <br />Ayes: Mosteit, Moser, Engelken, Rigby, Clausen, Ebow, Griffiths and Mayor. <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Interim City Manager John Joerns advised Council we are looking to answer the questions <br />that were raised regarding the retiree class. We are taking direction for a future budget <br />amendment or do we stand to pass on the retiree freezes. <br />Councilmember Griffiths noted he thought it is way too expensive and too much of a burden <br />on the citizens to take on the $170,000.00 and look to increase that amount in following <br />years. He was of the opinion, we should not look at freezes. <br />Mayor Porter noted that the extra pool of funds is something that has always been pulled <br />from the General Fund. That should have been in the City's contribution always. It <br />provides a better grasp of what we are doing with the funds. He noted we want to take care <br />of the employees but somewhere down the road it is going to get out of hand. Citizens will <br />start to question what we are doing. <br />Mayor Ported asked the Interim City Manager if he had clear direction. <br />Councilmember Mike Clausen noted he was not in favor of the extra $170,000.00, He noted <br />he wants to take care of employees but we have the rest of the citizens to take care of as <br />well. <br />Councilmembers Ebow, Mosteit and Engelken agreed with not funding the $170,000.00. <br />Councilmember Moser made the following comments: <br />He noted he has been on Council for over two years and has looked at the budgets. He has <br />been part of the budget process. He noted what comes to his mind real quick is, like <br />Councilmember Rigby indicated, before we subsidize three other enterprise funds. We also <br />just got through installing $262,000.00 in entry markers with only one bidder. He noted it is <br />hard for him to understand just where the budget impact is at. When he sees the kind of stuff <br />going on. He has been called out tonight on this. He wasn't going to say anything, but <br />decided to until he sees constraints and controls with other departments. He noted it was <br />hard for him to punish employees or ask them to fund these markers that are coming into the <br />City. He has issues with that and that is just the way it is. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.