Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting, Workshop Meeting and Public Hearing —October 23, 2006 <br />Page 7 <br />Abstain: None <br />2. Do not recommend Individual Child Premium Load. Could make a 5`h tier in a 4 tier <br />structure with specific language that says dependent children can remain on the insurance to <br />age 25 if they are a student and not married. <br />Motion was made by Council member Clausen to not recommend Individual Child Premium <br />Load as recommended by Chapter 172 Board and clarifying yes to coverage to age 25 if a <br />full time student with a minimum of 12 hours and not married. Second by Council member <br />Griffiths. The motion carried. <br />Ayes: Mosteit, Moser, Beasley, Engelken, Rigby, Ebow, Clausen, Griffiths and Mayor. <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />3. Do not recommend to 10% Cost Savings with Plan Design Changes. <br />Motion was made by Council member Beasley to not recommend 10% Cost Savings with <br />Plan Design Changes as recommended by Chanter 172 Board. Second by Council member <br />Griffiths. The motion carried. <br />Ayes: Mosteit, Moser, Beasley, Engelken, Rigby, Ebow, Clausen, Griffiths and Mayor. <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />4. Recommend a one-time deferral at the discretion of the Retiree with a spousal provision <br />as outlined in COBRA. Which is: If a Retiree is carrying their spouse at retirement then the <br />spouse could re-enter when the retiree re-enters. <br />Motion was made by Council member Beasley to recommend one-time deferral at the <br />discretion of the Retiree with a spousal provision as outlined in COBRA Which is: If a <br />Retiree is carrying their spouse at retirement then the spouse could re-enter when the retiree <br />re-enters as recommended by Chapter 172 Board Second by Council member Griffiths. <br />The motion carried. <br />Mayor Porter voted for but has serious reservation regarding the repercussions of not having <br />a cap at age 65. <br />Ayes: Mosteit, Moser, Beasley, Engelken, Rigby, Ebow, Clausen, Griffiths and Mayor. <br />Nays: None <br />Abstain: None <br />5. Recommends that Retiree Over/Under 65 Calculation not be used and remain as it is. <br />Motion was made by Council member Beasley to recommend that Retiree Over/Under 65 <br />Calculation not be used and remain as it is as recommended by Chapter 172 Board Second <br />by Council member Ebow. The motion carried. <br />Ayes: Mosteit, Beasley, Engelken, Ebow, Clausen, Griffiths and Mayor. <br />Nays: Moser and Rigby <br />Abstain: None <br />