My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2007-06-25 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting (2)
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2007
>
2007-06-25 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:22 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/25/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Meeting and Workshop Meeting - June 25, 2007 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Moser: that's my fear with this study the fact that the number is going to be "I'm going <br />to throw down a million dollars right now it cost $375,000 is what it cost to fund our <br />retirees that serve the City the accrual comes back at over a million dollars" We go to <br />budget this upcoming budget in August, this number is going to be held over the retirees <br />head and that's where were going to start cutting their benefits. That is what I perceive <br />this accrual statement doing to us is being used against them come budget time. <br /> <br />Mayor: Actually, it is all employees and retirees. That is everybody in the insurance <br />pool. It is not just retirees its our obligation to everybody that's in the system. <br /> <br />Tom: they'll look at their length of service. <br /> <br />Moser: it's our obligation to them. <br /> <br />Dolby: your talking about everybody all together the current and retirees together. <br /> <br />Moser: yes but the retirees is what is going to be effected by this come budget if this <br />number cannot be funded. If this council decides that this number cannot be funded <br />those retirees are the ones that are going to get cut at that time or their benefits will <br />possibly get cut to bring the accrual into our financing plans. <br /> <br />Tom: I'm not real familiar with your plan but I think you only have one plan, so if you <br />have one plan it will effect current employees and retirees as well. <br /> <br />Dolby: together yes. <br /> <br />Moser: the retirees are the ones trying to live now. The are the ones on the fixed <br />income that I'm concerned too about. So I guess that's why I'm focused on them but I <br />understand what you are saying. <br /> <br />Tom: again GASB45 does not mandate funding liability. <br /> <br />Beasley: even if that million dollars comes back we don't have to fund it. We don't <br />have to do anything, we can live year to year, and hope for the best for the future. If <br />council ten years from now has to cut things, they cut things and we can just go year to <br />year and hope for growth in the city and other places. <br /> <br />Rigby: that growth could affect our bond rating. <br /> <br />Tom: I think what they are looking at is the trend and how you react to the trend as a <br />management group. <br /> <br />Dolby: that means if it goes up we need to take steps and try to mitigate it and get it <br />down. <br /> <br />Tom; unless revenues are up. <br /> <br />Moser: that's the reason you do it every year. That is a good point you brought we are <br />talking about an irrevocable trust is the only way this thing will work. <br /> <br />Tom: it's not mandated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.