My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2012-12-10 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2010's
>
2012
>
2012-12-10 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:14:28 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/10/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Director Tim Tietjens presented a summary. <br />Councilmember Engelken moved to authorize the City Manager or his designee to send a letter of <br />support for the proposed Mariposa at Pecan Park apartment project for senior adults to be located <br />along Canada Road. Councilmember Zemanek seconded. MOTION PASSED. <br />Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Leonard, Zemanek, <br />Kaminski, Clausen, Martin and Moser <br />Nays: None <br />Absent: Councilmember Mosteit <br />8. DISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTION <br />(a) Discussion or other action regarding the report from the Citizens' Charter Review Advisory <br />Commission — P. Fogarty <br />City Secretary Patrice Fogarty introduced Chuck Harrington, the Chairman of the Citizens' Charter <br />Review Advisory Commission, who provided a PowerPoint presentation and proceeded to <br />discuss proposed amendments to the Charter. <br />Councilmember Engelken moved to direct staff to move forward with ballot language for the May <br />Election. Councilmember Zemanek seconded. MOTION PASSED. <br />Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Leonard, Zemanek, <br />Kaminski, Clausen, Martin and Moser <br />Nays: None <br />Absent: Councilmember Mosteit <br />(b) Discussion or other action regarding health care benefits for retirees — C. Alexander <br />City Manager Corby Alexander presented a summary regarding health care benefits for retirees. <br />Mayor Rigby commented there was a great deal of information provided to Council for review, but <br />there has never been a definitive cost placed in the budget specifically for dependent coverage <br />since his employment with the City or as a Councilmember. Mayor Rigby also commented <br />consultants had provided Council with the cost the City would pay for dependent health care <br />benefits. <br />Councilmember Engelken commented the calculations the retirees were given should be honored <br />because they made a decision to retiree based on what they were told by Human Resources. <br />Councilmember Zemanek commented that when he reviewed information provided by the City, it <br />was alarming that with one offered plan, from 2007 to 2013, the employee cost went down 16 <br />percent but when adding dependent coverage, it went from 17.22 percent of dependent coverage to <br />120 percent. Councilmember Zemanek also commented he had never seen dependent coverage <br />120 percent of primary coverage; and a he felt this is where the issues are with retirees, specifically <br />in the future; the numbers are not fair or accurate. Mayor Rigby asked Councilmember Zemanek if <br />he was referring to the cost for dependent premiums vs employee premiums. Councilmember <br />Zemanek responded that based on the spreadsheet provided by staff, in 2007 the 500 Plan cost for <br />employee was $670.00 a month, and now it is $562.00 a month; and dependent coverage for <br />employee and spouse in 2007 was $111.00 a month; and now it is $675.00 a month. <br />Councilmember Martin commented he agrees with Councilmember Engelken in that it is not fair for <br />the City to tell retirees the healthcare cost they were given when they retired is no longer being <br />honored, and the cost will be increasing. Councilmember Martin commented the City owes it to the <br />five affected retirees to make things right, because they made a decision to retire after seeking the <br />City's advice and opinion. Councilmember Martin also commented he would be interested in <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />December 10, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.