Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Zemanek moved to accept the bid proposal for Wave Pool Mechanical Building <br />Renovation and open the Wave Pool as scheduled. Councilmember Clausen seconded. MOTION <br />PASSED. <br />Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Zemanek, Kaminski, Engelken, <br />Mosteit, Clausen, Leonard and Moser <br />Nays: None <br />Absent: Councilmember Martin <br />Mayor Rigby left the table at 6:50 p.m. and returned at 6:51 p.m. <br />7. DISCUSSION OR OTHER ACTION <br />(a) Discussion or other action regarding Utility Infrastructure Report — D. Mick <br />Public Works Director Dave Mick Public Works presented a report regarding Utility Infrastructure <br />and recommended $2 million a year for capital improvements. He stated one way to fund this is a <br />$1.50 fee per 1000 gallons. <br />Councilmember Zemanek commented a citizen owning a $150,000.00 home would see a 12.7 <br />percent increase, which amounts to a tax that is not deductible. <br />Councilmember Engelken questioned the current capacity to issue debt. City Manager Corby <br />Alexander responded around $7 million. Councilmember Engelken commented debt has not been <br />issued in a while; so, there is capacity, and a $9.00 a month fee is not the way to go. <br />Councilmember Moser questioned if the increase in fund balance was $4,600,000. City Manager <br />Corby Alexander responded yes. <br />Councilmember Mosteit questioned Public Works Director Dave Mick when staff rehabilitates the lift <br />stations on L Street, will they consider the potential for Harris County to expand L Street in the <br />future. Mr. Mick responded yes. <br />Council directed staff to look at other options to maintain the system without adding a fee to fund it. <br />(b) Discussion or other action regarding Street Report — D. Mick <br />Public Works Director Dave Mick and provided a report regarding the condition of streets in the City <br />of La Porte. HDR Project Manager, John Peterson, was present. Mr. Mick presented Council <br />with the following four options for funding street repairs. <br />Councilmember Mosteit left the table at 7:30 p.m. and returned at 7:33 p.m. <br />Option 1: Maintain current funding levels equal to the street tax revenue of approximately <br />$870,000.00 per year. <br />Option 2: Consider funding for replacing concrete 1/60 of the city streets assuming a 60-year life <br />cycle. This requires an increase in street maintenance funding of approximately $1,870,000 per <br />year over existing levels. With nearly two-thirds of the existing concrete streets maintained by the <br />City now over 40 years old, the City will not keep up with all streets reaching the projected 60-year <br />service life over the next 20 years. <br />Option 3: Consider funding for replacing concrete streets at an average age of concrete pavement <br />equal to 55 years old and re-evaluate after a follow-up comprehensive inspection in 4 years. This <br />requires an increase in street maintenance funding of approximately $3,400,000 per year over <br />existing levels. This option assumes 100 percent removal and replacement of concrete streets and <br />100 percent City funded over the next 20 years. Staff is not recommending this option. <br />Option 4: Consider funding an amount midway between Option 2 and Option 3. This requires an <br />increase in street maintenance funding of approximately $2,635,000 per year over existing levels. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />March 25, 2013, City Council Meeting Minutes <br />