Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Leonard questioned Mr. Stokes if the Galveston Bay Foundation currently works <br />with any groups at La Porte High School. Mr. Stokes responded the Education Director does work <br />with La Porte students, and they are always looking for more opportunities to expand with students. <br />Councilmember Martin questioned Mr. Stokes if the Galveston Bay Foundation was classified as <br />tax exempt and if they intend to pay any property taxes. Mr. Stokes responded Galveston Bay <br />Foundation is 501(c)(3) Tax Exempt; and the intention is not to pay taxes but to generate sales <br />taxes with the Galveston Bay Foundation's presence. Councilmember Martin questioned who are <br />the stakeholders for Galveston Bay Foundation? Mr. Stokes responded, the entire community; <br />different facilities along the bay; and they work with local communities doing projects. <br />Councilmember Martin questioned if there is a financing plan in place. Mr. Stokes responded the <br />.plan is to raise money for the purchase; they have access to capital to ultimately pay cash. <br />Councilmember Martin questioned if there is an interest in a lease agreement. Mr. Stokes <br />responded the goal is to own; but if the city is interested in a lease, he is open to discussion. <br />Councilmember Martin questioned if the Galveston Bay Foundation owned the property, how <br />accessible will it be to individuals? Mr. Stokes responded they will have programs for adults and <br />children with access along the water. <br />Councilmember Moser questioned if Galveston Bay Foundation has a position on the Ike Dike. Mr. <br />Stokes responded the Galveston Bay Foundation is absolutely supportive of the discussion of storm <br />surge suppression and does not take a position pro or con on either the Centennial Gate or the Ike <br />Dike because neither are completely studied at this time. <br />Councilmember Zemanek questioned the anticipated capital outlay for the Galveston Bay <br />Foundation Project. Mr. Stokes responded between $12-14 million; up to $4 million for land <br />purchase; approximately $5 million for construction; $1 million to be invested in education activities. <br />Mayor Rigby questioned City Manager Corby Alexander if the project will be discussed in Executive <br />Session and a possible decision reached after reconvening. City Manager Corby Alexander <br />responded yes. <br />(b) Discussion or other action regarding appointment to the La Porte Area Water Authority — P. <br />Fogarty <br />City Secretary Patrice Fogarty presented a summary. <br />Councilmember Moser moved to appoint Charlie Perry to the La Porte Area Water Authority. <br />Councilmember Kaminski seconded. MOTION PASSED. <br />Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Engelken, Leonard, Moser, <br />Clausen, Earp, Engelken, Martin, and Kaminski <br />Nays: None <br />Absent: None <br />(c) Discussion or other action regarding renaming N. 51 Street to Martin Luther King, Jr., Blvd. — C. <br />Alexander <br />City Manager Corby Alexander presented a summary. <br />Councilmember Zemanek questioned how many properties abut either side of N. 5th Street, and <br />how many are controlled by the City. City Manager Corby Alexander responded 66 abut, and he <br />would have to confirm how many are controlled by the City. <br />Councilmember Moser moved to give the City Manager authority to sign the petition to rename <br />N. 5th Street to Martin Luther King, Jr., Blvd. Councilmember Kaminski seconded. MOTION <br />PASSED. <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />October 13, 2014, Council Meeting Minutes <br />