My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-14-81 Civil Service Commission Meeting minutes
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Civil Service Commission
>
1980's
>
1981
>
09-14-81 Civil Service Commission Meeting minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2016 1:37:16 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:25:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Civil Service Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/14/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Civil Service Meeting <br />September 14, 1981 <br />~• Page 15 <br />Hudgens: Are they challenging the promotional exam? <br />Trainer: The three Captains that were eligible for the test did not pass the test <br />and they promoted the Lieutenant to Asst. Chief. The Lieutenant passed the exam. <br />Hudgens: I was talking to Fritz Lanham in Baytown. Baytown has been Civil Service <br />for some time. He was telling me that they had given a promotional exam for Sergeant <br />and nobody passed it. <br />Trainer: The statements of the three Captains---they thought they had made their <br />point to the City by taking the action they took. I just couldn't figure out what <br />the hell they were trying to say. I think they were trying to gracefully crawfish <br />out of a problem they had gotten themselves into. <br />Freeman: Mrs. Davis and I contacted the Director of Civil Service in Galveston and <br />he said it got to be a game as to who was going to file the next lawsuit on a <br />promotional exam, so it is quite a problem. <br />Trainer: The--ah--kind of testing we have to establish---have you worked up some <br />recommendations for us in terms of the type of test to adopt? <br />Hudgens: Well, the format is pretty well set by the Act. <br />Trainer: Right. <br />Hudgens: It must--everybody must have the test. It has to <br />be graded so its either multiple choice or true and false. <br />books that the tests will be taken from have not be-n adop <br />the hand-outs that Mary gave you. She started to get some <br />literature in the profession. There's two things that can <br />get someone, say, from up at Sam Houston --ah-- <br />be something that can <br />The questions or the <br />ted. That was one of <br />information or current <br />be done; ah--we could <br />Davis: That's what Pasadena does; they use a consulting firm out of Houston. <br />Hudgens: ---or we could go to the Institute. <br />Trainer: Department of Criminology. <br />Hudgens: Yeah, ah--matter of fact, one of the Chairmen of the Department---he's one <br />of the Chairmen within the Division within the department up there---is a fellow by <br />the name of Weylon Pelcher, who is an Attorney and has been at the University now <br />since, I guess, about 1970--69--70, somewhere in there. He is a past--ah--Director <br />of Public Safety for the City of Corpus Christi; he was a legal advisor to the Police <br />Department in Chicago; a very knowledgable person. We could contact Weylon and maybe <br />he'll give us some assistance in drafting some type of promotional exam or get <br />current literature to take the test from. <br />Trainer: Has any--have any of you all seen anybody else's test? <br />,• Freeman: No sir. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.