Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Civil Service Meeting <br />September 14, 1981 <br />~ ~ Page 9 <br />~~ <br />• <br />that will provide the Chief more flexibility in assigning people ---because if you <br />move a person from one classification to another the only way it can be done is by <br />competitive exam; so the option was to either create a classification called <br />detective, which someone would have to take a promotional exam to make a detective, <br />or make them all patrolmen, and then assign them to investigation or make them all <br />Sergeants and assitn them to investigation. So in looking at that, the option of <br />making them detectives did not seem like a good idea because of having to give a <br />promotional examination, and that is kind of a specialty area where you can assign <br />someone there, maybe because of a particular interest or expertise, rather than <br />give a promotional exam. Also because of the size of the department, being as small <br />as it is, there will be some classifications that is going to be difficult to get <br />enough together to take the test. And so, we've ended up with two options; one is <br />to make them all patrolmen or make them all Sergeants. If we made them all patrol- <br />men, some of them would not receive any salary increase because their salary falls <br />between a patrolman and a Sergeant, and so the option was to go ahead and make <br />them all Sergeants, and that way he can move those people between patrol or criminal <br />investigation, depending on the needs of the department, just by assignment. He <br />can assign a Sergeant to criminal investigation or he can assign them to patrol. <br />Randall: In your pay status, Herb, do you have a set policy with duty of service <br />in your promotional, I mean as far as advancements in pay? How does that work in <br />the department? <br />~• Freeman: We have a step program with the City that's------ <br />Hudgens: Yeah, the current pay schedule on all the employees is based on merit. In <br />other words, when you come in, the City currently has a policy that says you serve <br />a 6-month probationary period so everybody comes in and then their given a set <br />range, a step, and after 6-months their eligible to go to step 'b', assuming they <br />satisfactorily complete their probation, then there's one year between each of the <br />following steps where they become eligible for a merit increase to the next step <br />provided their performance is satisfactory. <br />Randall: In other words, you sort of have wage progressions and then your merit <br />takes over and---- <br />Hudgens: --the wage progression is based on merit and one of the problems we ran into <br />with this was that Civil Service says not merit; it says everybody in the same <br />classification will be paid the same salary and they may be paid in addition thereto <br />any longevity pay, seniority pay, certification pay, etc. which they may be entitled. <br />So what we did--we kept a step system but we based it strictly on longevity. We'll <br />have a patrolman that has under 6 months service or until he completes the academy, <br />which ever is later on this thing. When he comes in, he'll start at a certain <br />salary, and when he completes the academy then he'll get a step increase. Once he <br />goes over a total of 12 months service, he'll get another step increase; then over <br />24 months; then over 36 months, and then they top out at 36 months. The same thing <br />would be for Sergeants and Lieutenants, with the exception that they won't have the <br />6 months deal; theirs would be a year, over 12 months, over 24 months, over 36 months. <br />