My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
06-03-09 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
2009
>
06-03-09 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 5:26:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/3/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The design capacity of a storm sewer system is based on the water surface elevation in <br />the receiving drainage channel and is considered the starting water surface elevation for <br />calculating the hydraulic grade line (HGL) elevation along the pipe network. It is <br />common engineering practice to set the starting water surface elevation at the top of <br />storm pipe. The existing storm sewer capacity was analyzed based on a top of pipe <br />starting water surface elevation of 14.69 (NA VD 88, 2001 Adj.) and invert elevation of <br />9.69 (NA VD 88, 2001 Adj.). <br /> <br />Exhibits 3, 4 and 5 is a ponding analysis that shows excess runoff cannot enter into the <br />storm sewer system. An inadequate number of inlets can cause this, the inlet capacity <br />may not be enough, or it could be due to an undersized storm sewer system. Increases in <br />ponding elevation are in 6-inch increments. When ponding depth approaches I8-inches <br />over the top of the curb, or inlet, areas that become inundated show some consistency <br />with repetitive loss data. Ponding elevations very from street to street based on runoff <br />instead of tail water backing up into the system from the channel. <br /> <br />2.5 Alternatives Evaluation <br /> <br />Alternatives evaluated include adding a storm sewer trunk line in addition to the exiting <br />storm sewer trunk to double capacity, replacing the existing trunk line with pipe for more <br />capacity and replacing or adding partial storm sewer improvements. In addition to storm <br />sewer improvements, roadway profile modifications were investigated either in <br />combination with storm sewer improvements or completely independent. <br /> <br />Improvements evaluated include: <br />1. Add Storm Trunk Parallel to Existing Trunk with Pavement Repair - Add an <br />additional storm sewer trunk line with additional inlets along the northbound side of <br />Fleetwood Drive and parallel to the existing trunk line from South Sycamore to the <br /> <br />2-4 <br /> <br />Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.009.000 <br />May 2009 <br /> <br />Fairmont Park East & Brookglen Drainage Study <br />City of La Porte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.