Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE ES -1 <br /> LIST OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FOR LUSTING CONDITIONS <br /> Total Construction Estimated Land Recommended For <br /> Construction Total Losses Cost Per Loss Acquisition Rapid <br /> ID Channel Location Denatiting Modification Type Description' Costa' Removed Removed Area Implementation Comments <br /> (5.«581844&u n.nxd.6S 01 m m (000) <br /> Relief Swales zls <br /> 5108.00-10. Trrpenaid4(w • Conle)Cl m el with Bwan Width: <br /> 1 5101-03•00 Pine1mn Valley • I Mkt Swale I103.775160(3 Dqichl aft 66,000 42 5140 003 YO No 6004 ao�i. veaten pmpa <br /> • <br /> • Tre0t®idel)C®v:ae) Memel with Beam Vldh — ._ __ Pmp.ea Relief Swan and (Nt&YPipe am be command <br /> 4112 -00-00. • 75.6105Swalo 1 ft & T3pinal Ien&3 ft; individually. The cost associated with iris recmrunaudminu <br /> 2 8112- 02-00 Bro0k0leu •9Oudall N p Increase Oldie Pipe. Sires 515,010 279 5350 0.4 - -__. Yes an.tumf, all the MicfswahS OMOmfa0pipCt <br /> • Trape.idel (Camat7)CTnm4d with Bratom Widm:i Pmpmod Relief Swan and Omfall Pipe can be cwvtniaa5 <br /> • 5 Relief Swab Ift &T)pic4 Depth: 3 ft; individualy.The.st associated with thin recannrendnion <br /> 3 4108-00.00 Fairmont Park W e s t . 7 ( 16 3 5 ) 7 50 •Itassesc Oatfell Pipe S¢. I 557,000_ 134 $370 0.24 Yee accounts let all the rend maks and outfell pipes.,. <br /> • Trapezoidal (Catmint)CTtarmd with Both. Width: - Prapor..d Aced Swale and Outl.0 Pipeae be castrucad <br /> • • 2 Relief Swales Ift &Typical Depth:3lt individually. The cot esociated with this rrsmmrndmirm <br /> 4 4)06 - 00.10 Oka Meadow •20ut1BPEs Tnenase Chesil P i_ 530,000 _ 56 -- _ - 6540 012 _ amounts ter all the relief atvaks and 0915.) pipes. ___ <br /> • Tnpme3dal (Calm.) Clannel with Bonn Width: Proposed Relief Swale and O0Vill Piper= boeunmmded <br /> individually. The rot anointed with this recommendation <br /> •i 0 . 2 0.5 wok R &Typical Depth:3 B, acrwmHbNtherdief swLes and omfWl pips. — <br /> 5 B 106 -05-00 Meadow Pah • 1 Out00 Pipe _ • home Outten Pipe Sin 513,000 24 S540 am Ye: __- <br /> •Trapxid4(Convek) Channel cords Both. Width: Propsed Relief Sonde and OM(all Pipe cm Ion 0onstru ad <br /> • 2 6.+i. 1 ft & Typical Clerk 3 111 individually: Me cat associated with tkistecomm.datbn <br /> 6 B106-0600 F a i r m o n t P i c t •2Outfell Pipes • Increaser/Wall �s Sins 119,000 34 $560 0.081 Ye: hewn fin a0 the reliefmaks and mean pipes____ <br /> • 1 Dapmoidal (Comae.) amend with Bottom Proposed Relief Swale and OuCa6 Pipe mm constructed <br /> •1 ReierSwele Within I ft 6 Typical Depth: aft; individually. The cost associated with thislcammendatim <br /> ? B10 -00 4eei®no1 Section l •IOmfoh Pipe • harass WWI Pipe Svc 534,000 56 5610 0.13 Ye memo thr ell the rJieTewelm mod Omfall ptlaa. _ <br /> •Tniprmidal (C. Memel nod with Bottom Width: - -__ .__ __ _._ -_ -- Proposed Relief Swale and Omfaln (Ype an be eenspveted <br /> H10600-00, •4 Rae Swains III &Typical Depth: 3II; utdi5du any. The cot asseIoW with Ins recomeadelion <br /> 8 8106 - 02-00 - _„ Faimm3 Peek East •S OWIWI Pip • theca. OMAR Pipe Sir. 565,000 7 6 3060 028 Yes ___ac 086. all to relief swains and outfh0 pipes._ <br /> Proposed Relief Mk and Ous.2e Pipe nen be constructed <br /> • Trapezoidal (Ca mdc) (Memel with 3attnm Width. individually, The cost associated with this ncwmv.detion <br /> 9 4309-00 -00 Sparer Highway •1 ReIkr5tvnle Ift &Typical Depth: 3lk _530,000 22 51,366 0.13 _ Ye l[mmts for all the rebefswab mad mlfdkpird <br /> - Proposed R4kfS wale andllot2Jl Pipe can be eensmeed <br /> • Trapezoidal (Come.) Cluuhel with Bottom Width: individually. Thu cot associated with this 1.06°mm:e ni® <br /> 10 8106 -03 -00 Vale Del8.sim • 1 Relief Swede Ift &TI1picel Delah :3 ft; 524,000 9 52670 0.1 __Ye accounts foe all the reaniwatm mud am&B pipe.__ <br /> • ft Typical Depth: 3 Chemed wrth Bodoni Wield: <br /> 11 5(06.00 -00 Bankgrmnd Eta. • / Relief Swale l R & 7]yica cal De Lkpth:3 B 335�MD 2 317,500 0 15 Yes No MRiI Relief ir Swale <br /> Pro a <br /> . .. -- ' . - - - - Proposed RdSwan ad Pipe meth different <br /> • Tripvnidst (Conner) Charnel with Bottom Width locations. They can be cmumdnl individually. The ten <br /> t..ef0085 Ift & Typical Depth:3 ft avxmimed with this rrmmmeedatien accounts for en the ra d' <br /> 12 5216-00.00 Old la Pork <br /> 1. IOmRBPipe • Increase Ou[13 Pipe Sue 9336,000 16 521,000 1.44 Ye swain end atPalli*a. <br /> Channel Improvements and Diversion Ponds 4 <br /> — <br /> • T0pm0dal. wadi. ehe.el 01 Length 2250 <br /> It Elevation Vellum: 32 ac -6; Mximum Top <br /> Wid(h:41 ft; Typical 55: 1.2:1 anneal 'mammon nod Mitlyulmt Pondahould be <br /> Fenn.. Park Fahmmt Park • Channel Improvement • Mid5mmn Pond (2460040) () Aodi%30 hers): constructed sisW1mr0valy, Pond cm be amstructed to sun <br /> 13(22)' 4106-02-00 Fist • Mitigation Pend Excavation Volume:4.0 .0-5 1761,7.00 34 123,000 2.5 • multiple &ration Imposes. <br /> Klotz Associates Projm No.: 0127- 008 -000 City of La Pone <br /> her.) 2009 • 1 013 • City Wide Drainage 40.01 <br />