Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ron Bottoms, City Manager k I o t z I 'kF, I a s s o c i a t e s <br />October 1, 2008 <br />Page 10 of 31 <br />communities in the Houston metropolitan area tend to be in the range 0.4 to 0.8 <br />ac-ft/ac. New developments should use such storage factors. Engineering review <br />of specific conditions in the City and possible adjustment of these factors need to <br />be considered. <br />For mitigation by detention, the City specifies storage coefficients which depend <br />upon developed area for areas less than 10 acres (as noted in section 2.1 above). <br />For larger areas, HCFCD criteria (10 to 100 acres) or review by the City Engineer <br />(greater than 100 acres) are applied. We would recommend that regional <br />detention alternatives be allowed (but not necessarily required) where conditions <br />would make regional detention feasible and effective, for which the regional <br />detention facility would have to provide for the proposed development area in <br />question the following information: <br />• The allocated storage in the regional detention facility for the developed area <br />would at a minimum have to meet the storage criteria as currently defined in <br />City criteria for on -site detention basins. <br />• Conveyance of storm waters from the developed area to the regional detention <br />must be shown to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that such conveyance <br />could be constructed and will be maintained by the development owner (or <br />other identified party acceptable to the City) and that the conveyance would <br />not adversely affect existing flood levels. <br />Common mitigation techniques are detention ponds, over -sizing of sewers, and, <br />less frequent but of increasing interest, subsurface detention systems. While such <br />detention storage measures are a heavily relied upon mitigation techniques, the <br />City should give consideration to the use of what are termed low impact <br />development (LID) techniques, which are on -site detention devices or systems <br />which limit runoff at or very near the point where runoff begins. Bio-retention, <br />swales, rain barrels, special types of pavement and surfacing, and similar <br />techniques can be used to promote infiltration and lessen direct runoff. <br />ft is recommended that low impact development techniques be allowed to be used <br />to the satisfaction of the <br />City Engineer that a proposed technique or collection of techniques will, with <br />frugh likelihood, not only achieve mitigation which equals or exceeds that required <br />for mitigation if a detention pond were to be used but also will, with high <br />likelihood, function as intended in light of required maintenance for such <br />techniques. The demonstration must recognize the potential reduction in <br />