My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Drainage_and_Flooding_Report-dated_10_03_2008
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
Drainage and Flooding Reports
>
Drainage_and_Flooding_Report-dated_10_03_2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:54:06 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:29:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Reports and Studies
Date
10/3/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ron Bottoms, City Manager k I o t z 'L4 0 a s s o c 'i a t e s <br />October 1, 2008 <br />Page 7 of 31 <br />2.4.5 Capacity Improvements in Storm Sewer Systems <br />A significant limitation to storm sewer capacity, as discussed in regard to sources <br />of drainage problems, is believed to derive from inadequate number or size of <br />storm sewer inlets in sewered areas. The City's drainage criteria spees that <br />maximum water travel distance in the street to a curb inlet shall not exceed 400 <br />feet in residential areas. The common recurrence of residential street flooding in <br />sewered-areas suggests that the 400-feet criteria may be inadequate. <br />A reasonable sense of the potential problems arising from inadequate storm sewer <br />inlet capacity because of too few inlets can be obtained by computing the average <br />length between inlets along storm sewered-streets (obtained by dividing the total <br />length of streets in sewered-areas by the number of street inlets in the same area). <br />Representative examples of such calculation are shown in Exhibit 12. The <br />subdivisions were arbitrarily chosen as representative examples and predate the <br />current criteria of 400 ft. Values commonly appear to exceed 400 feet in existing <br />residential areas, suggesting that inlets are typically spaced too far apart along <br />streets. <br />A detailed analysis for the storm sewer would have to be made to determine if <br />there are any benefits for adding inlets for current storm sewer systems. However, <br />consideration should be given to requiring that maximum inlet spacing be 300-ft <br />for new residential developments, unless it can be shown by engineering <br />calculation that the maximum ponding depth in the gutter upstream of the inlet <br />will not exceed the lesser of the top of street crown or the top of curb along the <br />drainage path leading to the inlet from the farthest point draining to the proposed <br />inlet. <br />Also to be avoided are the long stretches of no street inlets at the upstream end of <br />a sewer line run. Slight changes in street slope due to construction procedures <br />may reduce the planned gutter flow capacity toward the last upstream inlet in a <br />line of street inlets. It would be recommended that engineering for new <br />developments be required to assess inlet spacing and location in light of the <br />realities of very flat street slopes and inaccuracies in construction, and identify an <br />appropriate maximum distance of gutter runs without sewer inlets which would <br />recognize inaccuracies in slope estimate and construction. <br />Capacity limits can also be significant at outfalls if outfalls are too small. Small <br />outfalls (i.e., small diameter outfall pipe) produce large energy losses. In addition, <br />small outfalls are quite susceptible to blockage by debris, either from upstream or <br />backup from receiving waters. It would be recommended that the minnnum <br />outfall size be 24-inches in diameter (or equivalent diameter). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.