Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fill Dirt Review Committee M.es- July 18, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />owner who used fill dirt and the City for issuing the permit. He requested the City stop issuing <br />permits until drainage is improved. <br /> <br />Bill Scott - 1802 Lomax School Rd. - Mr. Scott provided the committee pictures to review. He <br />did not leave them for the official record. He informed the committee the fill dirt being brought <br />in by a neighbor is causing flooding to his property. He further noted, no permits have been <br />issued to this location. He requested the City check out this matter. <br /> <br />Sidney Grant requested to speak again in response to other citizens comments. Chairman Mosteit <br />requested he put the information in writing since he had already spoken for five minutes. <br /> <br />John Hambrick - 1402 Lomax Dr. - Mr. Hambrick expressed concerns about fill dirt in the <br />Lomax area. He informed the committee he had brought this matter before City Council and was <br />referred to staff. Nothing has ever been done to resolve the issue. <br /> <br />Fred Bender - 2302 Lomax Dr. - Mr. Bender believes dirt being brought in is excessive. He <br />requested his neighbors be reasonable in their actions. He requested City Council to look closely <br />at this matter. <br /> <br />4. COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO DISCUSS AND REVIEW THE ACCEPTANCE FOR <br />FILING AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 1444-A AND <br />RESOLUTION 2003-19 THE MORATORIUM REGARDING THE ACCEPTANCE FOR <br />FILING AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 1444-A AND <br />PROVIDE STAFF WITH DIRECTION TO RESEARCH THE BACKGOUND ON THE <br />CITY OF LA PORTE DRAINAAGE, mSTORY OF THE ORDINANCES, AND <br />TESTIMONIES FROM THE CITIZENS <br /> <br />Barry Beasley informed the committee he had reviewed the other City Ordinances and does not <br />believe they will be much help. Noted he reviewed the state statute and found it interesting and <br />some other City's use the state statute rather than adopting an Ordinance. <br /> <br />Bruce Meismer informed the committee a reasonable solution would address the following areas: <br /> <br />. Bring in dirt to fill holes and eliminate standing water but not change the topographical <br />lay of the land <br />. If there were a topographical change, a certified study would need to be completed by a <br />Public Engineer. It would need to incorporate addressing silting, vegetation and concerns <br />. Property owners need to be responsible for complying with the limits of issued permits <br />and be reasonable to their neighbors <br /> <br />Chuck Engelken agrees with Mr. Meismer. He wants to know what process are followed issuing <br />permits and what type of follow up is done. If properly enforced upfront, may not result in <br />problems. <br /> <br />Bruce Meismer wanted the record to reflect that he read Water Code Section 11.086 - Overflow <br />Caused by Diversion of Water (a) No person may divert or impound the natural flow of surface <br />waters in this state, or permit a diversion or impounding by him to continue, in a manner that <br />damages the property of another by the overflow of the Water diverted or impounded. (b) A <br />person whose property is injured by an overflow of water caused by an unlawful diversion or <br />impounding has remedies at law and in equity and may recover damages occasioned by the <br />overflow. <br />