Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The review board discussed the appeal and reviewed the presented materials. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Moore to accept the appeal and was seconded by Mr. Handy. The Motion <br />Carried. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br />Abstain: <br /> <br />Handy, Moore, Hayes, Craft, and Browder <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />4. CONSIDER APPEAL # 04-04 REQUESTED FOR PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION OF <br />PROPERTY AT 9529 W. FAIRMONT LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH. APPEAL IS IN REFERNCE TO <br />DECISION MADE BY FIRE MARSHAL TO REQUIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BE INSTALLED PER <br />ORDINANCE 603.15.9. THIS APPEAL IS BEING SOUGHT UNDER THE TERMS OF SECTION <br />105.3 OF THE SBCC11994ed. <br /> <br />STAFF PRESENTATIONS <br /> <br />Deputy Fire Marshal Philip Creamer reviewed Appeal Request # 04-004 as outlined. The applicant <br />has requested an Appeal to the Fire Marshal's decision to require installation of a sprinkler system for <br />new construction of the Life Community Church located at 9529 W. Fairmont. <br /> <br />PROPONENTS <br /> <br />Pastor Alan Neel- representing Life Community Church addressed the board. Pastor Neellisted for <br />the board his reasons for why he feels the Appeal should be granted to allow the construction without <br />a sprinkler system. His main argument is that his church is being built with a 4 hour fire wall dividing <br />the church in half, the hallways were 4 hour rated, and precedence has been set with the appeal <br />approval given to the First United Methodist Church. <br /> <br />OPPONENTS <br /> <br />No Opponents <br /> <br />Deputy Fire Marshal Philip Creamer reiterated the following: <br /> <br />· The church is a combined 18,000 S.F. <br />· The Building code has a maximum of 12,000 S.F. per floor and per multistory without adding an <br />automatic sprinkler system. <br />· All Class A assemblies have to be sprinklered per city ordinance. <br />· Per 1997 Life Safety Code - NFP A 101, assembly occupancies with occupant loads of greater than <br />300 shall be protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Craft to deny the appeal and was seconded by Mr. Handy. The Motion <br />Carried. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br />Abstain: <br /> <br />Handy, Moore, Hayes, Craft, and Browder <br />None <br />None <br />