04-07-1988 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• GOLF COURSE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 7, 1988 PAGE 3 It was also brought up about a set time for the senior citizens to have for "tee off". After some discussion by the Board it was decided to wait until a few months after the course is open and see if there is any problem being caused by not Raving certain times for tee off. • ITEM_ N0. 6: OTHER_BUSINESS - CLUBHOUSE: John Joerns presented to the Board the status of the clubhouse. He said that Staff's recommendation to Council was to accept the low bid of Builders Construction subject to negotiation to build only the clubhouse at a price not to exceed $195,500 and include alternate bid ~~2, the fire sprinkler system at $6,000.00. Also to negotiate the allowable construction days from 120 to 100. This would also exclude the proposed sitework for the present time. He stated that the alternate bid for the deck in the amount of $10,636, could be added at a later date as the amount for the clubhouse is already exceeding the amount budgeted and the burglar alarm system ($4,000.00) could be also added later and perhaps at a more reasonable price. Staff feels that the bid on the clubhouse alone is a very good price and should be approved. The above recommendation will be presented to City Council on P~onday, April 11, 1988 for their approval or rejection. David Brady, as well as the rest of the Board, felt that the deck should be included in the base bid and that it was all considered to be one item and not an alternate. The Board felt that to build the clubhouse without the deck (to be added later) was wrong. David expressed that if $10,636.00 was all that was keeping staff from adding the deck that it should be done (all members agreed). He said we are already over budget and he didn't see how $10,000.00 could make that much difference. In fact, if it does, then maybe the entire clubhouse should be cancelled for now was the suggestion made by the Board. But if the clubhouse is built, then the deck should be included. The Board felt that the deck and clubhouse were all one structure and should be considered as such. A motion was made by Reed Tolles and seconded by Dennis Dunham that the Board opposed the awarding of the building without including the deck, or considering the deck as an alternate. Motion carried. .J