Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> <br />EXHIBIT B <br />FINAL EVALUATION <br />PE RSONNEL Q UALIFICATIONS WEIGHTIN G r'AC:'1'UH - 29.33 <br />FIRM RATER 1 RATER 2 RATER 3 RATER RATER 5 AVERAGE FINAL RATING <br />DANNENBAUM g0 95 88 92 80 89 26.10 <br />ESPEY/HUSTON g0 93 90 93 90 91.2 26.75 <br />CRSS 95 88 89 91 80 88.6 25.99 <br />TC&B 85 90 91 90 80 87.2 25.58 <br />EXPERIENC E OF r'iHM WElGH'1'IN G r'A(;'1'UR - 3Z . b'( <br />FIRM RATER 1 RATER 2 RATER 3 RATER RATER 5 AVERAGE FINAL RATING <br />DANNENBAUM 90 95 91 96 90 92.4 30.19 <br />ESPEY/HUSTON 95 95 92 97 90 93.8 30.64 <br />CRSS 95 92 92 94 90 92.6 30.25 <br />TC&B 90 85 90 95 85 89 29.08 <br />MET HODOLOGY WE1GH'1'IN G r'AC'1'UR - Sts <br />FIRM RATER 1 RATER 2 RATER 3 RATER RATER 5 AVERAGE FINAL RATING <br />DANNENBAUM 95 95 90 95 90 93 35.34 <br />ESPEY/HUSTON 88 95 91 95 90 91.8 34.88 <br />CRSS 95 95 88 94 80 90.4 34.35 <br />TC&B 90 95 92 94 80 90.2 34.28 <br />4iTMMARY <br />FIRM PERSONNEL FIRM METHODOLOGY TOTAL RATING RANKING <br />DANNENBAUM 26.10 30.19 35.34 91.63 2 <br />ESPEY/HUSTON 26.75 30.64 34.88 92.27 1 <br />CRSS 25.99 30.25 34.35 90.59 3 <br />TC&B 25.58 29.08 34.28 88.94 4 <br />