Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Texas Economic Development IJlcentives 2003 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 29 <br /> <br />the database of information currently collected on these local economic development <br />corporations was too limited to address this issue. <br /> <br />In July 2002, the Comptroller's office contracted with MGT to develop case studies of four <br />economic development corporations. [6] The case studies focus on the use of financial <br />incentives funded with economic development sales tax revenues. MGT was asked to <br />deduce from this limited sample, best practices and policy options that may (1) help <br />policymakers assess the impact of these corporations in the future, and (2) help these <br />corporations maximize effectiveness in promoting economic development. <br /> <br />MGT worked with the Texas Economic Development Council, a statewide professional <br />organization of nearly 900 economic development practitioners, to identify four <br />communities that represent a diverse sample in terms of population, geography and <br />economic development sales tax revenues. Two of the selected economic development <br />corporations (Abilene and Taylor) collect the ~4A sales tax, while the two others (New <br />Braunfels and Victoria) collect the ~4B tax. Revenues raised by the ~4A tax may be used to <br />fund projects specifically related to manufacturing and industrial development. The ~4B <br />tax, authorized in 1991, may be spent on infrastructure and quality of life improvements, as <br />well as traditional economic development. Figure 3-1 illustrates the population breakdown <br />of cities that impose either the ~4A or ~4B tax. <br /> <br />Figure 3-1: What Size Cities Levy the ~4A and ~4B Economic Development Sales Tax? <br /> <br />50,000 fa gun <br />Papulatian <br />10,000104',999 3% <br />Populalion <br />20% --_~~_:_~_---------.." <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />100,000 <br />PapalallDn <br />Dr Mar. <br />2% <br /> <br />Under 1.000 <br />Po p u lalian <br />12% <br /> <br />5.000 la g,ggg <br />Papulalia n <br />16% - ~---- <br /> <br /> <br />l,DDD 10 4,999 <br />--._.._ Populalian <br />--...- 47'Y. <br /> <br />Source: Comptroller of Public Accounts <br /> <br />The case studies are intended to provide the Comptroller's office with an understanding of <br />the activities undertaken by the corporations, with an emphasis on their results , and an <br />analysis of their practices. The case studies are not intended to assess whether ~4A or ~4B <br />tax revenues have been spent appropriately or to evaluate the operations of the individual <br />corporations. <br /> <br />Given the limited scope of this research, it is important to note that general conclusions <br />about the effectiveness of the economic development sales tax based on four case studies is <br />not possible; however, these case studies do provide an example of common practices. <br /> <br />Best Practices <br /> <br />All of the economic developers interviewed were interested to learn about "best practices" <br /> <br />http://www.window.state.tx.us/specialrptlecodev03/06ch3 .html <br /> <br />9/27/2004 <br />