Laserfiche WebLink
Chief Adcox presented draft language for a multi -year contract which in summary says that a <br />market survey would be completed each April for implementation each October and the City <br />agrees to adjust the scale to market with a cap of 3%. <br />At 3:18 p.m. the Association called a caucus. At 3:36 p.m. the Association returned <br />The Association came back stating that they would be interested in the numbers we came up <br />with and implementation of the compression starting the 2"a year of the multi -year contract <br />and working in phases to reduce the number of steps in each rank. Example: 2"d year of <br />contract, move Patrol from 12 steps to 11 steps; Sergeants 10 steps to 8 steps; Lieutenants 10 <br />steps to 7 steps. These changes would be in addition to market survey adjustments. <br />The Chief advised that the City would have to be cautious when obligating the City in future <br />years with no guide as to the impact it will have. We will already be bringing forward the multi- <br />year agreement that will contain language in regard to future year's salary increases and that <br />approach is a new idea being presented to Council. To combine this increase with the <br />additional compensation that would be required to incrementally collapse employee pay steps <br />would likely be more than the City would be able to agree to, especially in a multi -year contract <br />and without knowing what the future holds in the way of City costs, revenues, etc. <br />Marcus Upchurch advised he would like to see the raises be in line with regular employees of <br />3% increments between steps. Chief Adcox said that he agreed that increases between steps <br />should be meaningful and that it appears that there are currently too many steps to allow for <br />this, particularly for sergeants and lieutenants. It is simply a matter of how much the City can <br />afford to do and when. <br />As an alternative to be explored, Chief Adcox advised that it would be helpful to look at how <br />much it would cost to simply take the determined new market median for the bottom and top <br />step of each rank and place a number of steps in between the two medians, at 3% increments. <br />This means that the bottom median would stay the same, increase by 3% for as many steps <br />necessary until the top median was reached. Chief Adcox reiterated that this option would <br />have to be studied in order to determine the overall budget impact before it could even be <br />considered, but was worth exploring. <br />Ms. Anderson advised that the City's HR Department would look to see how this would work <br />out with the existing market survey numbers. if this approach works out then it would be a <br />possibility to look at the bottom and top numbers for median salary each year and implement <br />the steps based on the 3% difference between steps. Ms. Anderson advised that she <br />understood what was being proposed and committed to having the numbers for the next <br />meeting. <br />Chief Adcox went on to advise that, if the City was to agree to a 3 year contract, it would be <br />very important for the City/Association to have something hammered out relating to the <br />implementation of an Assessment Center before raises are implemented during the second <br />