My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1985
>
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:52:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/15/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Wilson and `,tubers of the Commission <br />City of LaPorte Page ~ <br />is a problem prevalent in the LaPorte area. The citizen comment <br />indicates that increasing maximum height restrictions on single <br />family detached dwellings to forty-five (45) feet from thirty- • <br />five (35) would allow homes to b e built on stilts, and also <br />would allow homes to have the grade buildup of a brick facade <br />on the grading. Thirty-five (35) feet of height should allow <br />for standard two story homes built on stilts, particularly <br />when taking into account the fact that height, as defined, in <br />this Ordinance, takes the average of the roof height above <br />grade, as opposed to measuring from the peak of the roof to <br />grade to obtain your height figure. Therefore dwelling units <br />could actually be in excess of thirty-five (35) feet from the <br />peak of the roof to grade, but would not be measured as such <br />under standard code procedures in this Ordinance. In addition, <br />it should be noted that our proposed flood zone Ordinance in <br />all cases, either maintains current flood zone standards, or <br />actually decreases flood zone requirements. Increase of a <br />residential permissable height in a single family detached <br />dwelling unit district would possibly provide for a lack of <br />uniformity among adjoining homes in a particular neighborhood. <br />On the other hand, there would be no impact regarding the <br />ability of emergency equipment to service a forty-five (45) foot <br />home, and in any case forty-five (45) feet as a permissabl e <br />height for duplexes, townhouses, or multiple family dwelling <br />units would not seem be inappropriate. <br />ANALYSIS: Leave the height restriction at thirty-five (35) <br />feet for single family detached, and discuss the need to in- • <br />crease the height limitation to forty-five (45) feet for dup- <br />lexes, townhouses, quadraplexes, and multiple family dwelling <br />units according to citizen comment. <br />The next citizen comment on Table R relates to density for single <br />family detached dwelling units. Citizen comment indicates that <br />density should be increased from 4.5 dwelling units per acre <br />to 4.8 dwelling units per acre. .Also, in multiple family <br />dwelling units citizen comment indicates that the density <br />should be increased from the currently proposed 25.6 dwelling <br />units per acre to 27 dwelling units per acre, which is the <br />current requirement under Ordinance 780. The subject of resi- <br />dential density received exhaustive coverage and debate by the <br />Steering Committee. Review of the Citizen Committee Report, <br />tog ether with pertinent sections of the Comprehensive Plan, <br />reveal mixed ideas regarding density figures. The issue is of <br />major importance when correlated to LaPorte's long term popula- <br />tion projections, the ability of the City to provide services <br />for a fixed number of population, and overall crowding and <br />urban density within a limited geographic area. However, the <br />changes are minor and would materially impact the City's ability <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.