08-15-1985 Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~ ~~ • MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 15, 1985 PAGE 4 ANDY WILSON: officer would determine the compatibility of the use as pertaining to the existing uses and also future uses surroung the property and this section doesn't say who would make a determination of compatibility; and then, what is compatibility; is it architectural scheme, color, use, or it is not fairly defined and then the other thing is future uses in an area. It is not possible to determine that, so we feel like that other sections in the zoning ordinance actually deal with what this section is trying to achieve, so we recommend that this section be stricken from the ordinance. Article 6 - 501 Same type of comment here under the commercial section in the commercial district as we do under the residential district pertaining to the landscape setback that this is actually park area along this greenway corridor and that the City should provide for it and maintain it. Sect. 6 - 600 - We feel that if in a storage area has ade additional 5 feet se stored prior to the necessary for storag they already have a the way around them. commercial zone, if a quate screening that these tbacks have things that are screening, chances are it is e yard type situations when complete screened fence all Article 8 - 400 This is the limitation on conditional use permits and we feel like that should be lengthened to somewhere between 3 - 5 year limitation. Also, we made that same comment in Sect. 10 - 201 ~~4. I believe one of those might pertain to the conditional use permits for prior public utility districts and the other one is just conditional use permits on anything. Ms. Gray asked if anyone had any questions. Suggested this information be moved to a second meeting to discuss it in length. He then asked •