My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1985
>
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:52:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/15/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />• AUGUST 15, 1985 <br />PAGE 6 <br />BOBBY BLACKWELL: Could you refer back to that for me personally <br />what section exactly you are talking about? <br />Where we're asking for another 20 ft? <br />EDDIE GRAY: SECTION 3, 5-201 - SEC. 6-501 <br />BOBBY: Let's look at that now. <br />Section 6-501 - <br />EDDIE GRAY: For instance, where they are showing the greenway <br />corridor along the Big Island Slough, and also <br />along the big drainage ditch that runs beside the <br />park at Fairmont Park, if this had been in effect <br />at the time that we did that, we would have to <br />set aside an additional 20' on either side of the <br />drainage area and then the people that back up to <br />that drainage ditch, their lot would stop 20' <br />short of it and they would have a fence, then <br />they would be 20' behind the fence. Either the <br />city would have to maintain it, or I don't think <br />the people living there would maintain a 20' <br />space behind their back fence. <br />As I understand the proposed ordinance in these <br />greenway corridors, the city would be purchasing <br />or either trying to use existing right-of-ways as <br />much as possible. <br />BOBBY: Just trying to use existing right-of-ways, we <br />don't want to purchase anything. <br />EDDIE: O.K. but there are a few places that there aren't <br />existing right-of-ways so they've got some green <br />on the map; but even the 80~ that is <br />alreadyexisting right-of-way so why should people <br />that own property along that existing <br />right-of-way have to get another 20' on either <br />side of it, landscape it and maintain it just to <br />make the greenbelt that much wider. <br />BOBBY: I understand that. <br />ANDY: Any more questions? <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.